Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Al-Jazaeri, Aymana; * | Alhammad, Abdulazizb | Almuhaideb, Manac | Alyahya, Ahmedc | Al-Jazaeri, Sarahd | Alyami, Fahade
Affiliations: [a] Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia | [b] Department of Radiology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia | [c] College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia | [d] College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia | [e] Department of Urology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Ayman Al-Jazaeri, College of Medicine, King Saud University, P.O. Box 7805, Riyadh 11472, Saudi Arabia. E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: BACKGROUND: A multi-pod catheter (MPC) is a large drainage catheter that can house multiple smaller retractable (MPC-R) and deployable catheters (MPC-D) within the body. OBJECTIVE: The drainage capabilities and resistance to clogging of a novel MPC have been assessed. METHODS: The drainage capabilities are evaluated by placing the MPC in a bag of either a non-clogging (H2O) or clogging medium. The results are then compared to matched-size single-lumen catheters with either a close (CTC) or open tip (OTC). The means of five test runs were used to measure drainage rate, maximum drained volume (MaxDV), and time to drain the first 200 mL (TTD200). RESULTS: In the non-clogging medium, MPC-D had a slightly higher MaxDV than MPC-R, and higher flow rate than CTC and MPC-R. Moreover, MPC-D needed less TTD200 than MPC-R. In the clogging medium, MPC-D had a higher MaxDV than CTC and OTC, higher flow rate, and faster TTD200 than CTC. However, comparison with MPC-R showed no significant difference. CONCLUSION: The novel catheter may offer superior drainage compared to the single-lumen catheter in a clogging medium, implying various clinical applications, particularly when clogging is a potential risk. Further testing may be required to simulate various clinical scenarios.
Keywords: Catheter, drainage, peritoneal dialysis, foley, ventriculoperitoneal shunt
DOI: 10.3233/THC-230015
Journal: Technology and Health Care, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 2155-2164, 2023
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]