Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Wenzl, Marcus P.a; * | Heller, Markusb | Janz, Viktora | Perka, Carstena | Wassilew, Georgi I.a
Affiliations: [a] Orthopaedic Department, Centre for Musculoskeletal Surgery Berlin, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany | [b] Department of Engineering and the Environment, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, UK
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Marcus P. Wenzl, Orthopaedic Department, Centre for Musculoskeletal Surgery Berlin, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany. Tel.: +49 30 450615179; Fax: +49 30 450515922; E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Plain radiography, 2-dimensional (2D) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and computed tomography (CT) do not precisely display morphology and acetabular coverage in developmental dysplasia of the hip or pincer-type femoroacetabular impingement. Pelvic position and pelvic tilt affect assessment of the acetabular parameters, leading to misinterpretation. OBJECTIVE: We tested a 3-dimensional (3D) CT evaluation script to calculate the crossover sign (COS), acetabular coverage and morphology. METHODS: To test the method, we constructed a phantom pelvic model, in which the acetabulum was mounted at different coverages of the femoral head, and simulated a COS and the acetabular morphology. Additionally we examined the reliability and objectivity of this method in ten patients with CT scans of the pelvis for conditions unrelated to hip disorders. RESULTS: We obtained an average accuracy of the 3D CT evaluation script of -0.37∘ (range -3.84 to 3.88; SD ± 1.43) for morphology, and 0.002% (range -7.28% to 6.90%; SD ± 1.60%) for coverage of the femoral head. Significant correlation between the expected and calculated COS (p= 0.01) was found. CONCLUSIONS: Our 3D CT evaluation script permits precise evaluation of the acetabular coverage profile, the presence or absence of a COS and acetabular morphology, independent of patient positioning or pelvic tilt.
Keywords: Acetabular coverage profile, crossover sign, 3D computed tomography
DOI: 10.3233/THC-170932
Journal: Technology and Health Care, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 989-1004, 2017
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]