You are viewing a javascript disabled version of the site. Please enable Javascript for this site to function properly.
Go to headerGo to navigationGo to searchGo to contentsGo to footer
In content section. Select this link to jump to navigation

A single task assessment system of upper-limb motor function after stroke



Nowadays, stroke is a leading cause of disability in adults. Assessment of motor performance has played an important role in rehabilitation for post stroke patients. Therefore, it is quite important to develop an automatic assessment system of motor function.


The purpose of this study is to assess the performance of the single task upper-limb movements quantitatively among stroke survivors.


Eleven normal subjects and thirty-five subjects with stroke were involved in this study. The subjects, who were wearing the micro-sensor motion capture system, performed shoulder flexion in a sitting position. The system recorded three-dimensional kinematics data of limb movements in quaternions. By extracting the significant features from these data, we built a linear model to acquire the functional assessment score (FAS).


All of the kinematics features have a significant statistical difference (P < 0.05) between patients and healthy people, while the feature values have a high correlation with Fugl-Meyer (FM) scores (r > 0.5, p < 0.05), indicating that these features are able to reflect the level of motion impairment. Furthermore, most samples of the linear model locate in the confidence interval after regression, with the residual approaching a normal distribution. These results show that the FAS is capable of motor function assessment for stroke survivors.


These findings represent an important step towards a system that can be utilized for precise single task motor evaluation after stroke, applicable to clinical research and as a tool for rehabilitation.



Lloyd-Jones D., , Adams R. J., , Brown T. M., , Carnethon M., , Dai S., , De Simone G., , Ferguson T. B., , Ford E., , Furie K., , Gillespie C., , Go A., , Greenlund K., , Haase N., , Hailpern S., , Ho P. M., , Howard V., , Kissela B., , Kittner S., , Lackland D., , Lisabeth L., , Marelli A., , McDermott M. M., , Meigs J., , Mozaffarian D., , Mussolino M., , Nichol G., , Roger V. L., , Rosamond W., , Sacco R., , Sorlie P., , Stafford R., , Thom T., , Wasserthiel-Smoller S., , Wong N. D., , and Wylie-Rosett J., Executive summary: Heart disease and stroke statistics-2010 update: A report from the american heart association, Circulation, vol. 121, no. 7, pp. 46-215, 2010.


Stinear C., Prediction of recovery of motor function after stroke, Lancet. Neurol., vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 1228-32, Dec. 2010.


Hobart J. C., , Cano S. J., , Zajicek J. P., , and Thompson A. J., Rating scales as outcome measures for clinical trials in neurology: problems, solutions, and recommendations, Lancet. Neurol., vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 1094-105, Dec. 2007.


Heller A., , Wade D. T., , Wood V. A., , Sunderland A., , Hewer R. L., , and Ward E., Arm function after stroke: measurement and recovery over the first three months, J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 714-719, 1987.


Wolf S. L., , Thompson P. A., , Morris D. M., , Rose D. K., , Winstein C. J., , Taub E., , Giuliani C., , and Pearson S. L., The EXCITE trial: attributes of the Wolf Motor Function Test in patients with subacute stroke, Neurorehabil. Neural Repair, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 194-205, 2005.


Steglind S, , Fugl-Meyer AR, , Jääskö L, , Leyman I, , Olsson S, The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance, Scand. J. Rehabil. Med., vol. 7(1): 13-31, 1975.


Lum P. S., , Burgar C. G., , and Van der Loos H. F. M., Quantification of force abnormalities during passive and active- assisted upper-limb reaching movements in post-stroke hemiparesis, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 652-662, 1999.


Colombo R., , Sterpi I., , Mazzone A., , Delconte C., , Minuco G., , and Pisano F., Measuring changes of movement dynamics during robot-aided neurorehabilitation of stroke patients, IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 75-85, 2010.


Timmermans A. Aa., , Seelen H. Am., , Willmann R. D., , and Kingma H., Technology-assisted training of arm-hand skills in stroke: concepts on reacquisition of motor control and therapist guidelines for rehabilitation technology design, J. Neuroeng. Rehabil., vol. 6, no. figure 1, p. 1, 2009.


Yang N., , Zhang M., , Huang C., , and Jin D., Motion quality evaluation of upper limb target-reaching movements, Med. Eng. Phys., vol. 24, pp. 115-120, 2002.


Churchill A. J. G., , Halligan P. W., , and Wade D. T., RIVCAM: A simple video-based kinematic analysis for clinical disorders of gait, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed., vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 197-209, 2002.


Patel S., , Hughes R., , Hester T., , Stein J., , Akay M., , Dy J. G., , and Bonato P., A novel approach to monitor rehabilitation outcomes in stroke survivors using wearable technology, Proc. IEEE, vol. 98, no. 3, pp. 450-461, 2010.


Patel S., , Hughes R., , Hester T., , Stein J., , Akay M., , Dy J., , and Bonato P., Tracking motor recovery in stroke survivors undergoing rehabilitation using wearable technology, Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc., vol. 2010, pp. 6858-6861, 2010.


Tedim V., , Ferro V., , Dieteren D., , Araújo I., , Aguiar C., , and Coutinho P., Medical Engineering & Physics Technical note A novel system for automatic classification of upper limb motor function after stroke? An exploratory study, Med. Eng. Phys., vol. 36, no. 12, pp. 1704-1710, 2014.


Yun X. Y. X., , Aparicio C., , Bachmann E. R., , and McGhee R. B., Design, Implementation, and Experimental Results of a Quaternion-Based Kalman Filter for Human Body Motion Tracking, IEEE Trans. Robot., vol. 22, no. April, pp. 1216-1227, 2006.


Paper W., , Paper W., , Matrices O., , and Matrices O., Application of quaternions to computation with rotations, vol. 1, 1995.


Huang Shuai, , Luo Chun, , Ye Shiwei, , Liu Fei, , Xie Bin, , Wang Caifeng, , Yang Li, , Huang Zhen, , Wu Jiankang, Motor impairment evaluation for upper limb in stroke patients on the basis of a microsensor, Int. J. Rehabil. Res., vol. 35, pp. 161-169, 2012.


Wang C., , Tao G., , Huang Z., , Wu J., , Liu F., , Huang S., , and Huang Z., Evaluation of Upper Limb Motion Function for Stroke Patients Rehabilitation, no. 60932001.


Gajdosik R. L., and Bohannon R. W., Clinical measurement of range of motion. Review of goniometry emphasizing reliability and validity, Phys. Ther., vol. 67, no. 12, pp. 1867-1872, 1987.


Youdas J. W., , Carey J. R., , and Garrett T. R., Reliability of measurements of cervical spine range of motion - comparison of three methods, Phys. Ther., vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 98-104; discussion 105-106, 1991.


Rohrer B., , Fasoli S., , Krebs H. I., , Hughes R., , Volpe B., , Frontera W. R., , Stein J., , and Hogan N., Movement smoothness changes during stroke recovery, The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, vol. 22, no. 18, pp. 8297-8304, 2002.