Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Auerbach, H.a | Schreyögg, J.b; * | Busse, R.b
Affiliations: [a] Institute of Pathology, Charité – University Medicine Berlin, Campus Mitte, Schumannstrasse 20/21, 10117 Berlin, Germany | [b] Department of Health Care Management, Faculty of Economics and Management, Berlin University of Technology, Institute for Technology and Management, Secr. EB2, Strasse des 17 Juni 145, 10623 Berlin, Germany
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Dr. rer. oec. Jonas Schreyögg, E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: Objectives:The purpose of this study is to assess the cost-effectiveness (net costs per life year gained) of telemedical devices for pre-clinical traffic accident emergency rescue in Germany. Methods:Two equipment versions of a telemedical device are compared from a societal perspective with the baseline in Germany, i.e. the non-application of telemedicine in emergency rescues. The analysis is based on retrospective statistical data covering a period of 10 years with discounted costs not adjusted for inflation. Due to the uncertainty of data, certain assumptions and estimates were necessary. The outcome is measured in terms of “life years gained” by reducing therapy-free intervals and improvements in first-aid provided by laypersons. Results:The introduction of the basic equipment version, “Automatic Accident Alert”, is associated with net costs per life year gained of €247,977 (at baseline assumptions). The full equipment version of the telemedical device would lead to estimated net costs of €239,524 per life year gained. Multi-way sensitivity-analysis with best and worst case scenarios suggests that decreasing system costs would disproportionately reduce total costs, and that rapid market penetration would largely increase the system’s benefit, while simultaneously reducing costs. Conclusion:The net costs per life year gained in the application of the two versions of the telemedical device for pre-clinical emergency rescue of traffic accidents are estimated as quite high. However, the implementation of the device as part of a larger European co-ordinated initiative is more realistic.
Keywords: Cost-benefit analysis, telemedicine, emergency medical services, ambulances, traffic accidents
DOI: 10.3233/THC-2006-14305
Journal: Technology and Health Care, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 189-197, 2006
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]