Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Boström, Martinaa; * | Kjellström, Sofiaa | Björklund, Anitab
Affiliations: [a] Institute of Gerontology, School of Health Sciences, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden | [b] Department of Rehabilitation, School of Health Sciences, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Martina Boström, MSc, Institute of Gerontology, School of Health Sciences, Box 1026, SE-551 85 Jönköping, Sweden. Tel.: +46 36 10 13 39; Fax: +46 36 10 11 80; E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: Background:As they age, older persons prefer to continue to live in their own homes. Sensors in the environment and/or bodily worn systems that monitor people might contribute to an increased sense of safety and security at home, but also raise concerns about the loss of privacy by surveillance. Little is known about how older persons, living at home independently and stating good health, perceive monitoring technology in terms of personal privacy. Objective:to identify and describe how older persons, perceive monitoring technology in terms of personal privacy. Method:A qualitative study based on five focus group interviews was used. Concepts of “freedom” and “surveillance” were used as content areas in the data analysis. Results:The results comprised three categories of ambivalence; “independence vs. security”, “privacy vs. intrusion”, and “in the best interest of me vs. in the best interest of others”. These three categories merged into the overarching theme “maintaining a sense of self” which illustrates a desire to maintain control of one’s life as long as possible. Conclusions: Older persons generally have positive feelings and attitudes toward technology and strive to maintaining a sense of self as long as possible, by having control. They stated high value to privacy, but valued being watched over if it ensured security. To feel good and bad about monitoring technologies, rather than good or does not necessarily lead to feelings of conflict.
Keywords: Focus groups, freedom, senior housing, surveillance
DOI: 10.3233/TAD-130376
Journal: Technology and Disability, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 117-125, 2013
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]