Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Vincent, Claudea; b; * | Deaudelin, Isabellea | Hotton, Mathieuc
Affiliations: [a] Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration (CIRRIS) Institut de Réadaptation en Déficience Physique de Québec, 525, boul. Wilfrid-Hamel est, Québec (Québec), Canada, G1M 2S8 | [b] Département de Réadaptation, Université Laval, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, Québec (Québec), Canada, G1K 7P4 | [c] Institut de Réadaptation en Déficience Physique de Québec, Program Déficience Auditive (Clientèle Adulte), 525, boul. Wilfrid-Hamel est, Québec (Québec), Canada, G1M 2S8
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author. Tel.: +1 11 1 418 529 9141 (ext. 6626); Fax: +1 11 1 418 529 3548; E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: We know very little about social participation following the use of an assistive technology, and nothing reagarding device designed to facilitate face-to-face communication between hearing persons and deaf people who use sign language, and cannot speak and write. A pilot on evaluating social participation following the use of a new assistive technology is proposed. Fifteen deaf adults completed a three-month field study, with pre and post intervention measures. Three standardized instruments (LIFE-H, FACS, QUEST) were adapted for sign language interpretation and pretested. One month into the study, all participants had used the AT in 40% of ADL and 33% of social roles. AT use in life habits subsequently declined. The results for social participation showed only one significant improvement (p=0.026) after one month of AT use: the item concerning conversation with a hearing person. For functional communication, we found a significant improvement after 8 (p=0.016) and 12 weeks (p=0.012) for “social communication” only. The users were “neither dissatisfied nor satisfied” with the AT. Effectiveness, ease of use and follow-up services are considered critical. Methodological and technical improvements are suggested for researchers, developers, promoters and clinicians.
Keywords: Nonspeech communication, deaf persons, assistive technology, assessment, outcome measure, social participation, satisfaction
DOI: 10.3233/TAD-2007-19401
Journal: Technology and Disability, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 153-167, 2007
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]