Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Umbach, Gaby
Affiliations: Global Governance Programme, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, European University Institute, Via Giovanni Boccaccio 121, Florence, 50133, Italy | E-mail: [email protected]
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Global Governance Programme, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, European University Institute, Via Giovanni Boccaccio 121, Florence, 50133, Italy. E-mail: [email protected].
Note: [1] The article is based on the joint research of the author with Debora Valentina Malito and Nehal Bhuta for the co-edited Palgrave Handbook of Indicators in Global Governance, Debora Valentina Malito, Gaby Umbach, and Nehal Bhuta (eds.). Cham: Springer International Publishing, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62707-6, on the author’s analyses within the GlobalStat project and her work for the Enlightenment 2.0 programme of the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre.
Abstract: This article1 offers reflections on the use of data as evidence in 21st century policy-making. It discusses the concept of evidence-informed policy-making (EIPM) as well as the governance and knowledge effects of data as evidence. With this focus, it interlinks the analysis of statistics and politics. The paper first introduces the concept of EIPM and the impact of evidence use. Here it focusses on science and knowledge as resources in policy-making, on the institutionalisation of science advice and on the translation of information and knowledge into evidence. The second part of the article reflects on data as evidence. This part concentrates on abstract and concrete functions of data as governance tools in policy-making, on data as a robust form of evidence and on the effects of data on knowledge and governance. The third part highlights challenges for data as evidence in policy-making, among them, politicisation, transparency, and diversity as well as objectivity and contestation. Finally, the last part draws conclusions on the production and use of data as evidence in EIPM. Throughout the second part of the reflections, reference is made to Walter Radermacher’s 2019 matrix of actors and activities related to data, facts, and policy published in this journal.
Keywords: Evidence-informed policy-making, data, evidence, measurement, policy process, policy-making
DOI: 10.3233/SJI-200735
Journal: Statistical Journal of the IAOS, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 1043-1055, 2020
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]