You are viewing a javascript disabled version of the site. Please enable Javascript for this site to function properly.
Go to headerGo to navigationGo to searchGo to contentsGo to footer
In content section. Select this link to jump to navigation

A review of argumentation for the Social Semantic Web

Article type: Research Article

Authors: Schneider, Jodi; | Groza, Tudor; | Passant, Alexandre

Affiliations: Digital Enterprise Research Institute, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland. E-mail: [email protected] | School of ITEE, The University of Queensland, Australia. E-mail: [email protected]

Note: [] Corresponding author.

Keywords: Argumentation, Semantic Web, Social Web, ontologies

DOI: 10.3233/SW-2012-0073

Journal: Semantic Web, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 159-218, 2013

Published: 2013
Get PDF open access

Abstract

Argumentation represents the study of views and opinions that humans express with the goal of reaching a conclusion through logical reasoning. Since the 1950's, several models have been proposed to capture the essence of informal argumentation in different settings. With the emergence of the Web, and then the Semantic Web, this modeling shifted towards ontologies, while from the development perspective, we witnessed an important increase in Web 2.0 human-centered collaborative deliberation tools. Through a review of more than 150 scholarly papers, this article provides a comprehensive and comparative overview of approaches to modeling argumentation for the Social Semantic Web. We start from theoretical foundational models and investigate how they have influenced Social Web tools. We also look into Semantic Web argumentation models. Finally we end with Social Web tools for argumentation, including online applications combining Web 2.0 and Semantic Web technologies, following the path to a global World Wide Argument Web.

Show more