Affiliations: Centre for Information and Innovation Law (CIIR),
University of Copenhagen, Studiestræde 6, 1455 Copenhagen, Denmark. Tel.:
+45 35 32 33 39; E-mail: [email protected]
Abstract: The pharmaceutical sector in the European Union is innovative, but
not innovative enough to compete on the world market. This article addresses
this issue from the perspective of market harmonization, since the European
Commission perceives – according to the 'European 2020 Flagship Initiative –
Innovation Union' – market fragmentation to be one of the major causes of the
lack of innovation. In order to establish if maximum harmonization benefits
innovation, two distinct legal regimes in the pharmaceutical sector will be
compared. The general rules for medicinal products are weighed against the
orphan medicinal products scheme. The latter is subject to uniform Union rules
specifically introduced to stimulate research and development and has led to
the development of a number of new products. The article shows that the most
radical positive integration depends to a large extent on the prospect of it
yielding revenue for the innovator. Hence, fuller harmonization can benefit
innovation, but it is just as important, if not more important, to address
other factors such as pricing, reimbursement and patent protection.