Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Farrugia, Albert
Affiliations: Biomedical Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Division of Health, Design and Science, University of Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia. E-mail: [email protected]
Abstract: Australia has followed a single supplier policy for the provision of blood and blood products, with an oft-declared policy of self-sufficiency. Up to 2005, the mainstay of this policy in the public domain was a provision in the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration's (TGA – the Australian regulator of therapeutic goods) Guidelines for the Registration of Drugs. This provision stated that overseas-sourced plasma products were required to demonstrate a clinical superiority over domestically sourced and manufactured products before they would be considered for approval on the Australian market. These domestic products have been historically supplied to the Australian community, through financial arrangements overseen by Australian governments, by CSL Ltd, a formerly government owned manufacturer of biological therapeutics which is now the world's largest private plasma products manufacturer. In 2004, a Free Trade Agreement between the United States and Australian governments included provisions, requested by the US government, which removed this requirement from the TGA's requirements. In addition, the Australian government committed to recommending an end to the current monopolistic arrangement to the other Australian jurisdictions, and to reviewing the whole area of plasma fractionation services. This review was conducted over 2006 and finalised its recommendations, which essentially advised the Australian government to maintain the current arrangements and recommended against the introduction of competition in domestic plasma fractionation services, in December 2006. Over the course of the review's work, intense public interest was evident in the issue, as shown by numerous media and other emanations. This work will review the background to Australia's blood system and, in particular, the convergent features which elicited the US FTA request and the reaction to it by the key stakeholders in the Australian blood economy. Some analysis will be offered to support an assessment of how these events can affect the status of recipients and donors in Australia's plasma product supply chain. Finally, opinion will be submitted on how these events can impact on international developments in blood safety and supply.
Journal: Pharmaceuticals, Policy and Law, vol. 9, no. 3-4, pp. 383-402, 2007
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]