Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Cambon, A.C.a; d | Baumgartner, K.B.b | Brock, G.N.a | Cooper, N.G.F.c | Wu, D.a | Rai, S.N.a; d; *
Affiliations: [a] Department of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA | [b] Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA | [c] Department of Anatomical Sciences {and} Neurobiology, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA | [d] Biostatistics Shared Facility, James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Shesh N. Rai, Biostatistics Shared Facility, James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, 505 South Hancock Street, Room 211, Louisville, KY 40202, USA. Tel.: +1 502 852 4030; Fax: +1 502 852 7979; E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: It is widely recognized that many cancer therapies are effective only for a subset of patients. However clinical studies are most often powered to detect an overall treatment effect. To address this issue, classification methods are increasingly being used to predict a subset of patients which respond differently to treatment. This study begins with a brief history of classification methods with an emphasis on applications involving melanoma. Nonparametric methods suitable for predicting subsets of patients responding differently to treatment are then reviewed. Each method has different ways of incorporating continuous, categorical, clinical and high-throughput covariates. More recent methods have built-in dimension reduction methods for high throughput data. Pre-validation is one method of assessing the added value of high-throughput data to clinical covariates. The way in which treatment interactions are incorporated is important if the goal is to predict a subset of patients which respond differently to treatment. For nonparametric methods, distance measures specific to the method are used to make classification decisions. Approaches are outlined which employ these distances to measure treatment interactions. It is hoped that this study will stimulate more development of nonparametric methods to predict subsets of patients responding differently to treatment.
Keywords: Classification, machine learning, dimension reduction, interaction, melanoma, clinical study
DOI: 10.3233/MAS-140310
Journal: Model Assisted Statistics and Applications, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 3-23, 2015
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]