Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Yao, Qianqian; 1 | Liu, Jiaojiao; 1 | Yuan, Kemei | Qiu, Xiaoqian | Wang, Jiemiao | Li, Jiang | Li, Changqin | zhu, Jianzhong | Qin, Jian; *
Affiliations: Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Taian, Shandong, China
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Jian Qin, Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, 366 Taishan Street, Taian City, Shandong Province, 271000, China. Tel.: +86 0538 6238002; E-mail: [email protected].
Note: [1] Qianqian Yao and Jiaojiao Liu are co-first authors with equal contribution to this paper.
Abstract: BACKGROUND:In vertebrae, the amount of cortical bone has been estimated at 30–60%, but 45–75% of axial load on a vertebral body is borne by cortical bone. OBJECTIVE:To compare the role of L1 CT-attenuation and cortical thickness in predicting osteoporosis by opportunistic CT and explore cortical thickness value in osteoporosis. METHODS:We collected data of 94 patients who underwent DXA and thoracic and/or abdominal CT to demonstrate an entire L1 for other indications in routine practice. Patients were divided into three groups according to T-score: osteoporosis, osteopenia, or normal. CT-attenuation value and cortical thickness of L1 were measured. ANOVA analysis was utilized to analyze CT-attenuation and cortical thickness among the three groups. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) predicting low BMD were determined using ROC. Pearson correlations were employed to describe relationship between L1 BMD and CT-attenuation value, BMD, as well as cortical thickness. RESULTS:The mean cortical thickness was 0.83±0.11, 0.72±0.10, and 0.64±0.09 mm for normal, osteopenia, and osteoporotic subgroups, respectively. A statistically significant difference was observed in cortical thickness and CT-attenuation value among these three subgroups. A mean CT-attenuation value threshold of > 148.7 yielded 73.0% sensitivity and 86.0% specificity for distinguishing low BMD from normal with an AUC = 0.83. Pearson correlation analysis indicated that BMD was positively correlated with CT-attenuation (r = 0.666, P < 0.001) and cortical thickness (r = 0.604, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS:L1 CT-attenuation and cortical thickness measured on opportunistic CT can help predict osteoporosis. Compared with cortical thickness, CT-attenuation is a more sensitive and accurate index for distinguishing low BMD from normal.
Keywords: Osteoporosis, cortical thickness, bone mineral density, dual x-ray absorptiometry, Computed tomography (CT)
DOI: 10.3233/XST-211106
Journal: Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 631-640, 2022
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]