You are viewing a javascript disabled version of the site. Please enable Javascript for this site to function properly.
Go to headerGo to navigationGo to searchGo to contentsGo to footer
In content section. Select this link to jump to navigation

Implementing green facades: A step towards sustainable smart buildings


As cities around the globe strive towards becoming “smart” and sustainable, the integration of green facades into smart building design has emerged as a viable solution to address several environmental challenges. This paper conducts a comprehensive review of current research and applications in green facades, analyzing their role in enhancing energy efficiency, improving indoor air quality, and contributing to overall building sustainability. The impact of green facades on reducing energy consumption, through natural insulation and shading, is explored in-depth, alongside their role in air purification and enhancing the aesthetic appeal of urban environments. Despite the potential of green facades, several gaps between theory and practice exist, including challenges in implementation, maintenance, and cost-effectiveness. This paper identifies these barriers and provides a robust discussion of potential solutions, which include technological innovations, policy support, and public awareness initiatives. Ultimately, the integration of green facades in smart buildings presents a significant step forward in creating sustainable urban environments, necessitating further research and action in this realm.


In the face of rapid urban development and escalating environmental concerns, the concept of ‘smart buildings’ has taken center stage in the discourse of sustainable urban design [12]. These intelligent infrastructures, characterized by the integration of advanced technologies, automation, and energy-efficient systems, have emerged as a promising avenue to meet the growing need for sustainability in urban development [20].

A key component of these smart buildings is the building facade, which holds significant potential in contributing to energy efficiency and overall sustainability [39]. Smart buildings offer an exceptional opportunity to reshape the built environment towards an energy-efficient future [17].

Traditionally, facades were viewed as mere aesthetic components of a building’s architecture. However, modern urban design and sustainable architecture have reassessed the role of building facades, focusing not just on their aesthetic appeal but also on their performance and environmental impact [37].

In this context, ‘green facades,’ where vegetation is incorporated into the building envelope, have been increasingly recognized for their multiple benefits, including energy conservation, indoor air quality enhancement, and carbon sequestration [35]. Green facades are now seen as a significant step towards achieving the goal of sustainable smart building design, given their multifunctional role in mitigating urban heat islands, reducing greenhouse gas emissions, and enhancing the aesthetic and sensory quality of the built environment [6]. Additionally, green facades and renewable energy technologies present viable answers to the environmental problems brought on by urbanization [3].

This paper seeks to delve into the growing significance of green facades in sustainable smart building design. It will examine their role in enhancing energy efficiency and improving indoor air quality, discussing practical challenges in their implementation, and suggesting potential solutions. The study aims to close the gap between theory and reality by providing information on how green facades are successfully integrated into smart buildings and how they contribute to urban sustainability.

2.Background and literature review

The incorporation of vegetation in building facades, known as green facades, has seen increasing attention in architectural design and urban development discourse in recent years. The Hanging Gardens of Babylon, one of the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World, is a historical example of a green facade, therefore the concept is by no means new [31]. However, the understanding and application of green facades have evolved, and they are now seen as a vital tool in sustainable urban design and smart building development.

2.1.The benefits of green facades

The benefits of green facades are numerous and cross-cutting. Green facades can considerably improve energy efficiency, a major issue in modern urban development, from an environmental point of view [31]. As natural insulators, they minimize heat absorption in the summer and heat loss in the winter, reducing the energy needed to cool and heat a building [1]. They can also improve indoor air quality by filtering airborne pollutants and absorbing harmful gases [15]. Beyond these benefits, green facades can also contribute to biodiversity, create a sense of wellbeing, and enhance the aesthetic value of the built environment [47]

2.2.Evaluating the impact of green facades

The advantages of green facades, notably their impact on energy efficiency and indoor air quality, have been the subject of several studies. Some studies used monitoring equipment to gather real-world data on energy savings and indoor air quality improvements in buildings with green facades [7]. Others have employed simulation tools to estimate the potential impact of green facades in various climate conditions and building types [16]. These investigations have generally confirmed the benefits of green facades, although the magnitude of these benefits varies depending on factors such as the local climate, the facade’s design, and the types of plants used [33].

2.3.Theoretical models and frameworks

Researchers have created a variety of theoretical models and frameworks to forecast and maximize the advantages of green façade. Some models concentrate on modelling the thermal performance of green facades and projecting how they will affect how much energy a building use [28]. Other frameworks try to evaluate the sustainability of green façade in urban development from an environmental, social, and economic perspective [43]. However, these models and frameworks often rely on idealized assumptions and may not fully capture the complexities of real-world applications.

2.4.Gaps in current research

Despite the growing body of literature on green facades, there are still gaps and uncertainties that warrant further research. For example, more empirical studies are needed to validate and refine the theoretical models used to predict the benefits of green facades [23]. Additionally, while many studies have explored the benefits of green facades individually, few have investigated their cumulative impact on the overall sustainability of smart buildings [28]. Lastly, the practical challenges of implementing green facades, such as maintenance requirements and initial installation costs, are often overlooked in the current research [36].

This paper aims to address these gaps by discussing the integration of green facades in smart buildings, examining their role in enhancing energy efficiency and indoor air quality, and exploring the challenges and potential solutions in their implementation. By doing this, it aims to close the knowledge gap between theory and practice and advance the field of sustainable urban development.

To better illustrate these aspects, the key benefits, research methods, theoretical models, and identified research gaps regarding green facades in smart buildings have been summarized in Table 1.

Table 1

Key aspects of green facades in smart buildings research

Benefits of Green FacadesResearch MethodsTheoretical ModelsIdentified Research Gaps
Energy EfficiencyReal-world data collectionSimulating thermal performanceNeed for more empirical studies
Improved Indoor Air QualitySimulationAssessing sustainabilityInvestigation of cumulative impact
Aesthetic EnhancementExploration of practical challenges

3.Green facades in smart buildings

Smart buildings represent the future of architectural design, embodying principles of sustainability, energy efficiency, and enhanced living comfort. A smart building is one that integrates various systems and technologies to manage its operations automatically, improving overall performance and energy use [24]. Green facades have emerged as a significant component of smart building design, contributing to the “smartness” of a building by enhancing its sustainability and responsiveness to environmental conditions.

3.1.Roles of green facades in smart buildings

Green facades can be regarded as a form of “living technology” that plays an active role in a building’s operations. They contribute to energy efficiency by regulating the building’s thermal performance, reducing the need for mechanical heating and cooling [29]. They also improve indoor air quality by filtering pollutants and absorbing CO2 [18]. Furthermore, the greenery can absorb and retain stormwater, reducing the building’s impact on local water management systems [14].

By responding to seasonal variations and weather conditions, green facades exhibit a form of “natural automation” that contributes to the smartness of a building. For example, the foliage can provide shade in the summer, reducing solar heat gain, and can allow more sunlight to reach the building surface in the winter when the plants lose their leaves [2]. This automated response to environmental conditions enhances the building’s energy efficiency without the need for complex technological systems.

Moreover, green facades can contribute to user comfort, a key aspect of smart building design. By enhancing the aesthetic value of the built environment and creating a sense of wellbeing, they can improve occupant satisfaction and productivity [40]. Research has shown a positive correlation between greenery and human well-being, suggesting that green facades can contribute to the holistic performance of smart buildings [10].

3.2.Examples of green facades in smart buildings

There are many successful examples of the integration of green facades into smart buildings. The Pixel Building in Melbourne, Australia, which received the highest Green Star rating ever given by the Green Building Council of Australia, is one example of this. The structure has a green facade that enhances its thermal efficiency, rainwater collection, and visual appeal [8]. Another example is the ACROS Fukuoka Prefectural International Hall in Japan, where a massive green facade improves the building’s energy efficiency and creates a vibrant public space [26].

These examples underscore the potential of green facades in enhancing the sustainability and smartness of buildings. By integrating green facades into the design and operation of buildings, we can make a significant step towards more sustainable, efficient, and enjoyable built environments.

4.Green facades and energy efficiency

One of the most important aspects of incorporating green facades into smart building design is their contribution to the energy efficiency of buildings. Green facades can increase a building’s overall energy efficiency by providing natural insulation and shading while lowering the need for artificial heating and cooling [40].

4.1.Green facades as natural insulators and shaders

Green facades act as an additional layer of insulation for the building envelope, helping to regulate the internal temperature. The plants can lower summer and winter heat uptake and loss, reducing the requirement for artificial climate control. Studies have shown that the thermal insulation provided by green facades can lead to energy savings of up to 15% in summer and 10% in winter [33].

Moreover, green facades serve as natural shaders, reducing the solar radiation reaching the building’s surface. This shading effect can reduce the building’s cooling load in summer, further contributing to energy savings. Research has demonstrated that green facades can reduce the surface temperature of a building by up to 20°C, leading to a potential reduction in cooling energy demand of up to 30% [7]. The processes through which green facades contribute to energy efficiency, acting as natural insulators and shaders, can be better understood through the flowchart represented in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Energy efficiency in green facades.

Energy efficiency in green facades.

4.2.Energy-saving potential of green facades

Numerous studies that quantified the energy-saving potential of green façade have proved their significant contribution to energy consumption reduction. For instance, Perez et al.’s (2017) study discovered that a building with a green facade can save up to 23% more energy each year than a similar building without one [31]. Similarly, a study by Perini et al. (2021) estimated that green facades could potentially save up to 200 kWh/m2 annually in energy consumption for cooling and heating [32]. As summarized in Fig. 1, the insulating and shading effects of green facades can lead to significant energy savings by reducing the demand for artificial heating and cooling.

4.3.Barriers and potential solutions

Despite their promising benefits, optimizing the energy efficiency of green facades presents certain challenges. For example, the performance of a green facade can be influenced by the choice of plant species, which can affect the thickness of the foliage and, hence, its insulating and shading abilities [32]. Moreover, maintenance can be a significant issue, as neglected green facades may deteriorate and lose their energy efficiency benefits [4].

Possible solutions to these challenges could include the development of guidelines for plant selection based on climatic and building conditions, as well as the implementation of low-maintenance green facade systems. Research into the integration of green facades with other building technologies, such as photovoltaic panels, could also enhance their energy-saving potential [42].

In summary, green facades have a big impact on how energy-efficient smart buildings are. They can lower the need for heating and cooling, resulting in significant energy savings, by supplying natural insulation and shading. While there are challenges to optimizing their energy efficiency, these can be addressed through appropriate plant selection, maintenance strategies, and technological integration.

5.Green facades and indoor air quality

The potential of green facades to improve indoor air quality (IAQ) is another important factor warranting their incorporation into smart building design. Green facades can play a significant role in air purification and the reduction of harmful pollutants, consequently impacting the health and well-being of building occupants [33].

5.1.Air purification and reduction of harmful pollutants

The natural air-purifying properties of plants are what enable green façade to enhance IAQ. Plants refresh the air by releasing oxygen and absorbing carbon dioxide through photosynthesis [19]. Furthermore, many plant species have been found to absorb harmful air pollutants, such as volatile organic compounds (VOCs), through their leaves and roots, transforming them into harmless substances [21]. Figure 2 provides a visual representation of the process by which green facades can contribute to improving indoor air quality. From the absorption of carbon dioxide and harmful air pollutants to the enhancement of air renewal, this flowchart illustrates the beneficial impact of green facades on the indoor air environment.

Fig. 2.

Process of indoor air quality improvement through green facades.

Process of indoor air quality improvement through green facades.

5.2.Impact of green facades on indoor air quality

Several studies have confirmed the positive impact of green facades on IAQ. A study conducted by Pérez et al. (2017) found that green facades can significantly reduce indoor levels of particulate matter (PM), which can pose serious health risks [31]. Furthermore, research by Yang et al. (2023) indicated that green facades can reduce indoor concentrations of harmful gases such as nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide [45].

5.3.Challenges and potential solutions

While green facades have shown promise in improving IAQ, there are challenges associated with achieving this potential. One of these challenges is the selection of suitable plant species. Not all plants have the same capacity for air purification, and some can even release harmful compounds [22].

Moreover, the effectiveness of green facades in improving IAQ can be influenced by factors such as maintenance and climate. Lack of proper maintenance can lead to plant deterioration and reduced air purification capacity, while unfavorable climatic conditions can limit the growth and survival of plants, thereby affecting their air purification potential [41].

Potential solutions to these challenges could involve the development of guidelines for plant selection based on their air purification capabilities, as well as the implementation of low-maintenance and climate-adapted green facade systems.

In sum, green facades can significantly contribute to improving IAQ in smart buildings. They can purify the air and reduce harmful pollutants, thereby promoting healthier indoor environments. Despite the challenges, these can be addressed through appropriate plant selection and maintenance strategies.

6.Challenges and solutions in implementing green facades

As with any technology, the implementation of green facades comes with practical challenges that need to be addressed to reap their full benefits. These include issues such as maintenance, cost, plant selection, and local climate considerations [16]. This section will explore these challenges, discuss potential solutions, and highlight the role of policy support and public awareness in promoting the implementation of green facades.

6.1.Maintenance and cost

One of the significant challenges of implementing green facades is their maintenance. The health of the plants, which is crucial for the effective performance of green facades, requires regular watering, fertilizing, and pruning [32]. This not only requires time and effort but can also result in considerable cost.

In terms of cost, the initial investment for installing green facades is typically higher than that for conventional facades. This cost can be prohibitive, especially for large-scale projects [16].

6.2.Plant selection and local climate considerations

The success of green facades largely depends on the selection of suitable plant species. Plants should be chosen based on their growth characteristics, resilience, and air-purification capabilities [44]. However, suitable plant species may vary depending on local climate conditions, which poses a challenge for the global applicability of green facades.

6.3.Potential solutions

Despite these challenges, there are potential solutions. Technological innovations, such as automated irrigation systems and sensors for monitoring plant health, can help reduce the maintenance effort and ensure the effective performance of green facades [46].

Regarding cost, studies have shown that while the initial investment for green facades is high, the long-term energy savings can offset these costs, making them a cost-effective solution in the long run [9].

6.4.Policy support and public awareness

Policy support and public awareness can play a crucial role in promoting the implementation of green facades. Governments can provide subsidies or tax incentives to encourage the use of green facades. Moreover, raising public awareness about the environmental and health benefits of green facades can increase their acceptance and adoption [13]. After exploring the various challenges and solutions associated with green facades, they are summarized in Table 2 for easy reference.

Table 2

Summary of challenges and potential solutions in implementing green facades

ChallengesPotential Solutions
MaintenanceTechnological innovations such as automated irrigation systems and sensors for monitoring plant health
CostLong-term energy savings offsetting the initial high costs
Plant SelectionResearch and guidelines for plant selection based on local climate and air-purification capabilities
Local Climate ConsiderationsSite-specific design and choice of resilient plant species suited to local climate conditions
Policy SupportGovernment subsidies or tax incentives
Public AwarenessPublic campaigns to raise awareness about the benefits of green facades

In conclusion, while there are practical challenges in implementing green facades, these can be addressed through technological innovations, cost-effective strategies, policy support, and public awareness. The benefits of green facades, ranging from energy efficiency to improved air quality, make them an essential element of sustainable smart buildings.

7.Discussion and implications

In light of the comprehensive review of the existing literature and case studies, the importance of green facades in smart buildings manifests itself in numerous ways. The benefits, ranging from energy efficiency, improved indoor air quality to the aesthetic appeal, underscore their potential role in sustainable urban development. However, challenges associated with implementation, maintenance cost, plant selection, and climate adaptation still remain significant [29].

7.1.Integrating green facades with smart technologies

Technology has the potential to address several of these challenges. Sensor-based technologies, IoT, and artificial intelligence can be harnessed to monitor the health of the plants, optimal irrigation levels, and the performance of the green facades [38]. Predictive algorithms can be developed to forecast future needs and changes, enabling preventive measures to be taken [30]. This not only ensures the sustainability of the green facades but also optimizes the benefits derived from them.

7.2.Potential human-centered challenges

While technology offers a plethora of solutions, it is important to consider potential human-centered issues. These could range from privacy concerns due to extensive data collection, to the risk of technology dependency [25]. Furthermore, a lack of technical knowledge could limit the effective usage and maintenance of these systems. Efforts should be made to develop user-friendly interfaces and offer training programs for the inhabitants of the buildings and maintenance staff [11].

Linking these findings to broader issues in sustainable urban development, architectural design, and policy-making, it becomes evident that green facades are not a standalone solution. They form part of a larger, holistic approach to building design, and urban planning which seeks to harmonize built environments with natural ecosystems [29]. Policymakers, architects, and urban developers must thus consider green facades as an integral element of smart buildings, alongside other sustainable technologies and design approaches.

The potential solutions proposed in this paper, such as leveraging technological advancements, careful plant selection, regular maintenance, and awareness programs, could significantly influence future practices. These strategies, coupled with supportive policies, can help overcome the implementation challenges and maximize the benefits of green facades [31].

From an economic standpoint, green facades may contribute to reducing energy costs in the long run, providing natural insulation, and reducing the need for mechanical cooling or heating systems [27]. Environmentally, they contribute to carbon sequestration, biodiversity enhancement, and improved air quality, aligning with the objectives of sustainable development [34]. Socially, green facades can improve a building’s visual appeal, promote occupant wellness, and possibly enhance the quality of urban life [5].

Despite the substantial advancements made in this area, there are still open research questions. Understanding the long-term effects of green facades on building structures, developing cost-effective and low-maintenance systems, researching the effects of climate change on the viability and effectiveness of green facades, and other topics are some of these.


The comprehensive exploration of green facades in the context of smart building design suggests a promising pathway towards more sustainable and smart urban development. The advantages they offer, including enhancing energy efficiency, improving indoor air quality, and aesthetic enrichment, underscore their importance in the realm of sustainable architecture and urban planning. With the aid of modern technology, green facades provide an effective method for enhancing the automation, responsiveness, and overall “smartness” of a building, contributing to the building’s sustainability.

Despite the well-documented advantages, the limitations in the current research and practices need to be addressed. Human-centric issues that can arise from incorporating technology within green facades should be carefully considered to minimize any potential negative side effects. Quantifying the precise energy savings offered by green facades remains complex due to the diversity of building designs, plant species, and climatic conditions. Furthermore, the impact of green facades on indoor air quality necessitates more thorough research to identify the most effective plant species and ensure system longevity.

9.Future directions

Further research is needed to develop cost-effective, low-maintenance green facade systems that effectively leverage technology. Technological advancements, such as automated watering and fertilizing systems or advanced sensors for plant health monitoring, could be key to these advancements. Similarly, understanding the socio-technological interplay in the use of these technologies can lead to more user-friendly systems and increase adoption rates.

Future directions in green facade research should focus on better integration of these systems within smart building technologies. This includes developing predictive algorithms for efficient management of green facades and understanding the role of IoT and AI in enhancing their performance. Creating region-specific guidelines for green facade implementation can further aid in resolving climate and plant selection issues.

In conclusion, green facades, coupled with appropriate technological interventions, represent a vital tool in the progression towards more sustainable, smarter buildings, and urban development. With continued research, policy support, and public awareness, the potential of green facades can be further unlocked and the challenges they present can be surmounted.


The authors extend their sincere appreciation to colleagues for their valuable contributions and insightful feedback that enriched this manuscript. Acknowledgement is also due to the research community whose foundational studies allowed for an in-depth exploration of green facades in the context of smart buildings. Gratitude is expressed for those involved in the peer-review process, whose suggestions and constructive critiques significantly improved the quality of this paper. Lastly, acknowledgement is made to the unending support and encouragement from friends and family that was instrumental throughout this research journey.

Conflict of interest

None to report.



A.M. Al-Tajer, A. Basem, A.F. Khalaf, A.A. Jasim, K.A. Hammoodi and H.Q. Hussein, A numerical simulation to select the optimal thermal agents for building parts, Mathematical Modelling and Engineering Problems 5: (9) ((2022) ), 1393–1398. doi:10.18280/mmep.090530.


V. Anderson, W.A. Gough, M. Zgela, D. Milošević and J. Dunjić, Lowering the temperature to increase heat equity: A multi-scale evaluation of nature-based solutions in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, Atmosphere 7: (13) ((2022) ), 1027. doi:10.3390/atmos13071027.


H. Arkar, L. Sui-Reng, A. Theingi and B. Amiya, Green facades and renewable energy: Synergies for a sustainable future, International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology 8: (5) ((2023) ), 219–223. doi:10.5281/zenodo.7937856.


A. Artino, R. Caponetto, G. Evola, G. Margani, E.M. Marino and E. Murgano, Decision support system for the sustainable seismic and energy renovation of buildings: Methodological layout, Sustainability 24: (12) ((2020) ), 10273. doi:10.3390/su122410273.


G. Beier, S. Niehoff and B. Xue, More sustainability in industry through industrial Internet of things?, Applied Sciences 8: (2) ((2018) ), 219. doi:10.3390/app8020219.


A. Canet-Marti, R. Pineda-Martos, R. Junge, K. Bohn, T.A. Paço, C. Delgado and G.F.M. Baganz, Nature-based solutions for agriculture in circular cities: Challenges, gaps, and opportunities, Water 18: (13) ((2021) ), 2565. doi:10.3390/w13182565.


J. Coma, G. Pérez, L.F. Cabeza, S. Burés, M. Urrestarazu and L.F. Cabeza, Vertical greenery systems for energy savings in buildings: A comparative study between green walls and green facades, Building and Environment 111: ((2017) ), 228–237. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.11.014.


F. Convertino, E. Schettini, C. Bibbiani and G. Vox, Effect of leaf area index on green facade thermal performance in buildings, Sustainability 5: (14) ((2022) ), 2966. doi:10.3390/su14052966.


A.M. Cüce, E. Cuce, T. Guclu and V. Demirci, Energy saving aspects of green facades: Current applications and challenges, Green Building & Construction Economics 2: (2) ((2021) ), 18–44. doi:10.37256/gbce.2220211007.


M. Fortunatus, A.E. Ephraim and I. Adamu, An assessment of end-user satisfaction of academic building facilities in tertiary institutions in Ghana: Perspective of staff of wa polytechnic, Journal of Resoureces Development and Management 66: ((2020) ), 52–59. doi:10.7176/jrdm/66-05.


F. Gandah, M. Al-Adayleh and M.R. Al-Ruwaishedi, Adopting smart building concept in historical building: Case of abu jaber museum, Jordan, Architecture and Engineering 3: (7) ((2022) ), 03. doi:10.23968/2500-0055-2022-7-3-03-12.


F.A. Ghansah, D. Owusu-Manu, J. Ayarkwa, A. Darko and D. Edwards, Underlying indicators for measuring smartness of buildings in the construction industry, SASBE 1: (11) ((2020) ), 126–142. doi:10.1108/sasbe-05-2020-0061.


D. Haase, N. Larondelle, E. Andersson, M. Artmann, S. Borgström, J. Breuste and T. Elmqvist, A quantitative review of urban ecosystem service assessments: Concepts, models, and implementation, AMBIO 43: (4) ((2014) ), 413–433. doi:10.1007/s13280-014-0504-0.


I. Hachoumi, B. Pucher, E.D. Vito-Francesco, F. Prenner, T. Ertl, G. Langergraber and R. Allabashi, Impact of green roofs and vertical greenery systems on surface runoff quality, Water 19: (13) ((2021) ), 2609. doi:10.3390/w13192609.


K. Han, Effects of indoor plants on the physical environment with respect to distance and green coverage ratio, Sustainability 13: (11) ((2019) ), 3679. doi:10.3390/su11133679.


W.T. Hong, K. Ibrahim and S.C. Loo, Urging green retrofits of building façades in the tropics: A review and research agenda, International Journal of Technology 6: (10) ((2019) ), 1140. doi:10.14716/ijtech.v10i6.3627.


A. Htet, S.R. Liana, T. Aung and A. Bhaumik, Smart buildings in the age of Internet technology: Civil engineering’s role in shaping an energy-efficient future: Civil engineering’s role in shaping an energy-efficient future, Journal of Technology Innovations and Energy 2: (2) ((2023) ), 8–19. doi:10.56556/jtie.v2i2.535.


P.J. Irga, T.H. Pettit, R.F. Irga, N.J. Paull, A.N. Douglas and F.R. Torpy, Does plant species selection in functional active green walls influence voc phytoremediation efficiency?, Environmental Science and Pollution Research 26: (13) ((2019) ), 12851–12858. doi:10.1007/s11356-019-04719-9.


C. Jung and J. Awad, Improving the iaq for learning efficiency with indoor plants in university classrooms in ajman, United Arab Emirates, Buildings 7: (11) ((2021) ), 289. doi:10.3390/buildings11070289.


E. Koda, K. Rybak-Niedziółka, J. Winkler, M. Černý, P. Osiński, A. Podlasek and M.D. Vaverková, Space redevelopment of old landfill located in the zone between urban and protected areas: Case study, Energies 1: (15) ((2021) ), 146. doi:10.3390/en15010146.


R. Kumar, V. Verma, M. Thakur, G. Singh and B. Bhargava, A systematic review on mitigation of common indoor air pollutants using plant-based methods: A phytoremediation approach, Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health ((2023) ). doi:10.1007/s11869-023-01326-z.


H. Lee, Z. Jun and Z. Zahra, Phytoremediation: The sustainable strategy for improving indoor and outdoor air quality, Environments 11: (8) ((2021) ), 118. doi:10.3390/environments8110118.


N.Y. Lim and N.M.R. Ismail, Aptitudes of double skin façade toward green building within built environment, Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences 3: (100) ((2022) ), 146–170. doi:10.37934/arfmts.100.3.146170.


Z. Liu, L. Jiang, M. Osmani and P. Demian, Building information management (Bim) and blockchain (Bc) for sustainable building design information management framework, Electronics 7: (8) ((2019) ), 724. doi:10.3390/electronics8070724.


F. Longo, A. Padovano and S. Umbrello, Value-oriented and ethical technology engineering in industry 5.0: A human-centric perspective for the design of the factory of the future, Applied Sciences 12: (10) ((2020) ), 4182. doi:10.3390/app10124182.


L. Mabon, K. Kondo, H. Kanekiyo, Y. Hayabuchi and A. Yamaguchi, Fukuoka: Adapting to climate change through urban green space and the built environment?, Cities 93: ((2019) ), 273–285. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2019.05.007.


U. Madushika, T. Ramachandra and D. Geekiyanage, Economic performance of green walls: A systematic review, in: Proceedings of 10th World Construction Symposium 2022, Sri Lanka: University of Moratuwa, (2022) , pp. 379–391. doi:10.31705/WCS.2022.31.


M.M.G. Mayhoub, Z.T.E. Sayad, A.A.M. Ali and M.G. Ibrahim, Assessment of green building materials’ attributes to achieve sustainable building façades using ahp, Buildings 10: (11) ((2021) ), 474. doi:10.3390/buildings11100474.


F.B. Moghaddam, J.M.V. Mir, I. Navarro and E. Redondo, Evaluation of thermal comfort performance of a vertical garden on a glazed façade and its effect on building and urban scale, case study: An office building in Barcelona, Sustainability 12: (13) ((2021) ), 6706. doi:10.3390/su13126706.


W.B. Monahan, T. Cook, F. Melton, J. Connor and B. Bobowski, Forecasting distributional responses of limber pine to climate change at management-relevant scales in rocky mountain national park, PLoS ONE 12: (8) ((2013) ), e83163. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0083163.


G. Pérez, J. Coma, S. Sol and L.F. Cabeza, Green facade for energy savings in buildings: The influence of leaf area index and facade orientation on the shadow effect, Applied Energy 187: ((2017) ), 424–437. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.11.055.


K. Perini, F. Magrassi, A. Giachetta, L. Moreschi, M. Gallo and A.D. Borghi, Environmental sustainability of building retrofit through vertical greening systems: A life-cycle approach, Sustainability 9: (13) ((2021) ), 4886. doi:10.3390/su13094886.


M. Radić, M.B. Dodig and T. Auer, Green facades and living walls – a review establishing the classification of construction types and mapping the benefits, Sustainability 17: (11) ((2019) ), 4579. doi:10.3390/su11174579.


T. Ramachandra, Innovative ecological approaches to ensure clean and adequate water for all, Journal of Environmental Biology 43: (3) ((2022) ), i–ii. doi:10.22438/jeb/43/3/editorial.


U. Rathnayake, D. Lau and C.L. Chow, Review on energy and fire performance of water wall systems as a green building façade, Sustainability 20: (12) ((2020) ), 8713. doi:10.3390/su12208713.


A. Sandak, J. Sandak, M. Brzezicki and A. Kutnar, Biomaterials for Building Skins, Bio-Based Building Skin, Springer, (2019) , pp. 27–64. doi:10.1007/978-981-13-3747-5_2.


E. Saretta, P. Caputo and F. Frontini, A review study about energy renovation of building facades with bipv in urban environment, Sustainable Cities and Society 44: ((2019) ), 343–355. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2018.10.002.


S. Sladojevic, M. Arsenovic, A. Anderla, D. Culibrk and D. Stefanovic, Deep neural networks based recognition of plant diseases by leaf image classification, Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience 2016: ((2016) ), 1–11. doi:10.1155/2016/3289801.


T. Srisuwan, Applications of biomimetic adaptive facades for enhancing building energy efficiency, International Journal of Building Urban Interior and Landscape Technology 20: ((2022) ), 7–18. doi:10.56261/built.v20.247184.


P. Šujanová, M. Rychtarikova, T.S. Mayor and A. Hyder, A healthy, energy-efficient and comfortable indoor environment, a review, Energies 8: (12) ((2019) ), 1414. doi:10.3390/en12081414.


V. Swillens, M. Decuypere, J. Vandenabeele and J. Vlieghe, Place-sensing through haptic interfaces: Proposing an alternative to modern sustainability education, Sustainability 8: (13) ((2021) ), 4204. doi:10.3390/su13084204.


M. Talaei, M. Mahdavinejad, R. Azari, A. Prieto and H. Sangin, Multi-objective optimization of building-integrated microalgae photobioreactors for energy and daylighting performance, Journal of Building Engineering 42: ((2021) ), 102832. doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102832.


P. Talhinhas, J.C. Ferreira, V. Ferreira, A.L. Soares, D. Espírito-Santo and T.A. Paço, In the search for sustainable vertical green systems: An innovative low-cost indirect green façade structure using Portuguese native ivies and cork, Sustainability 6: (15) ((2023) ), 5446. doi:10.3390/su15065446.


X. Wang, W. Gard, H. Borska, B. Ursem and J.V.D. Kuilen, Vertical greenery systems: From plants to trees with self-growing interconnections, European Journal of Wood and Wood Products 78: (5) ((2020) ), 1031–1043. doi:10.1007/s00107-020-01583-0.


Y. Yang, K. Hu, Y. Liu, Z. Wang, K. Dong, P. Lv and X. Shi, Optimisation of building green performances using vertical greening systems: A case study in Changzhou, China, Sustainability 15: (5) ((2023) ), 4494. doi:10.3390/su15054494.


Z. Yunfeng, S. Hanif and F. Fatima, Impact of climate change and technological advancement on cotton production: Evidence from Xinjiang region, China, Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 24: (6) ((2022) ), 1519–1531. doi:10.52547/jast.24.6.1519.


A. Zalejska-Jonsson, S. Wilkinson, R. Wahlund and R. Cunningham, Green spaces in housing development – buyers’ preferences, IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science 1176: ((2023) ), 012035. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1176/1/012035.