You are viewing a javascript disabled version of the site. Please enable Javascript for this site to function properly.
Go to headerGo to navigationGo to searchGo to contentsGo to footer
In content section. Select this link to jump to navigation

Decreased access to therapeutic services for children with disabilities during COVID-19 stay-at-home orders in Western Pennsylvania

Abstract

PURPOSE:

Assess the effects of stay-at-home orders on access to services utilized by families of children with disabilities (CWD).

METHODS:

Cross-sectional weekly surveys were fielded over four weeks, during which western Pennsylvania was under stay-at-home orders. Respondents were divided into families of CWD (N = 233) or without CWD (N = 1582). Survey questions included measures of socio-economic status, and families of CWD answered questions regarding access to services pre and post-initiation of stay-at-home orders. Differences between families with and without CWD were analyzed using chi-square tests.

RESULTS:

Among families of CWD that had used services previously, 76.6% of survey respondents stated that they had decreased access, with the greatest percentage experiencing loss among those previously utilizing early intervention (75.5%), outpatient therapies (69.1%), or school-based therapies (80.7%). Compared to families without CWD, families of CWD were more likely to report lower pre-COVID-19 annual incomes (p < 0.001), job or income loss related to COVID-19 (p < 0.001), and higher levels of perceived stress (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION:

CWD experienced loss of services during stay-at-home orders implemented as COVID-19 mitigation measures. Due to decreased access to needed services, CWD may be at risk of medical complications and loss of developmental progress.

1Introduction

Stay-at-home orders and school closures during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic had extensive consequences for children and families, especially those with fewer financial resources and greater healthcare and educational needs [1, 2]. One group at elevated risk of negative consequences were children with disabilities (CWD), particularly those who were part of marginalized populations [3, 4]. CWD often utilize extensive therapeutic and medical services [5], which are critical in optimizing function, and minimizing the impact of impairments [6]. These services traditionally are provided in-person, and access was disrupted due to COVID-19 mitigation measures [7].

The present study examined challenges faced by families with CWD during the stay-at-home order. Specifically, access to early intervention (EI), outpatient, and school-based services was assessed using a repeated cross-sectional survey, the Family Strengths Survey (FSS), part of an ongoing academic community collaborative called “The Pittsburgh Study.” [8]. In addition, differences in job loss and household income between families with and without CWD were examined to better understand the degree to which families of CWD were affected by COVID-19 mitigation measures.

2Methods

Initiated April 3, 2020, the FSS was a weekly anonymous survey of families in western Pennsylvania developed to identify strengths and needs of families during the pandemic. Surveys were available in English and Spanish, with invitations to participate distributed online through list-servs and social media. Completion of the survey could be done online or by telephone, although all responses in this study were obtained online (due to rare telephone participation). The FSS was reviewed by the institutional IRB prior to implementation and determined to be exempt. Eligibility was based on whether the respondent lived in western Pennsylvania, was 18 years or older and was pregnant, or had children under 17 years of age. Starting on April 17, 2020, questions identified CWD using a modified screener question based on the Children with Special Health Care Needs Screening tool [9]. Specifically, the survey asked whether “child(ren) in the home or immediate family have health problem(s) that cause them to be limited in their ability to do things that other children of the same age can typically do.” Respondents answering yes to this question were asked about service use over the prior six months and during the prior week, specifically about EI, outpatient or home-based therapies, school-based services, durable medical equipment (DME)/supplies, home nursing or home health aide services, and respite services. Perceived stress was measured between April 17 and May 1 using a modified set of standardized questions from the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS; [10]) validated in prior studies [10, 11]. The PSS responses were totaled and categorized into low, medium, or high stress based on previously published thresholds [10, 11].

Results from four weekly cross-sectional surveys fielded April 17-May 14, 2020, during which time western Pennsylvania was under stay-at-home orders, were pooled for analysis. Of the 2,384 surveys initiated, 1,815 (76.1%) met eligibility requirements and were fully completed. Differences in demographic characteristics, job loss, and perceived stress between families with and without CWD were analyzed using chi-square tests. Analyses were performed using Stata 16.0 (StataCorp, College Station, TX).

3Results

Of the 1,815 completed surveys during the four-week period, 233 were by families with CWD. Surveys by those with CWD were more likely to report lower pre-COVID-19 annual incomes (p < 0.001), and job or income loss related to COVID-19 (p < 0.001; Table 1). In addition, surveys by families with CWD were more likely to report higher levels of perceived stress (p < 0.001) than other families.

Table 1

Demographic characteristics and perceived stress levels from the family strengths survey

Families of children without disabilities total N (%)Families of children with disabilities total N (%)P-value
Respondents*1582 (87.2%)233 (12.8)
Racep > 0.5
  White1306 (82.6)179 (77.5)
  Non-White275 (17.4%)52 (22.5)
Annual family incomep < 0.001
  < $75,000605 (39.1)142 (62.6)
  >75,000943 (60.9)85 (37.4)
Job or income lossp < 0.001
  Yes714 (45.5)143 (61.9)
  No867 (54.5)88 (38.1)
Perceived stress level**p < 0.001
  Low275 (32.9)24 (19.8)
  Moderate532 (63.6)78 (64.5)
  High30 (3.6)19 (15.7)

*When data was missing for a certain characteristic, that subject was not included in the totals for that characteristic. **Only measured between April 17-May 1, 2020 (N = 958).

Among families with CWD, services most often used in the six-months pre-COVID-19 were EI (22.8%), outpatient therapies (36.1 %), and school-based therapies (48.9%). During the stay-at-home order period, 76.6% of surveys by families noted reduced access to usual services in the prior week (Fig. 1). Of those that had utilized EI, outpatient therapies, or school-based therapies, 75.5%, 69.1%, and 80.7%, respectively, reported reduced access in the prior week. The reductions in access to DME and nursing services were 9.3% and 18.8% in the prior week. Only two surveys indicated use of respite care pre-pandemic, with both reporting reduced access. Among surveys by families with CWD, 60.3% stated that they had a plan for their child’s care should they or another child’s caregiver become ill.

Fig. 1

Changes in access to services for CWD following implementation of COVID-19 mitigation measures. Results show numbers of survey responses, as well as percentages.

Changes in access to services for CWD following implementation of COVID-19 mitigation measures. Results show numbers of survey responses, as well as percentages.

4Discussion

Related to COVID-19 pandemic mitigation measures in the early pandemic period, access to essential services for CWD were severely curtailed, placing these children at significant risk for loss of developmental progress and medical complications. This study found that families with CWD had lower pre-pandemic income, which is consistent with prior studies [12, 13, 15]. In addition to this lower pre-pandemic income [14], data show that families with CWD were more likely to report income loss during this time period, suggesting that those with CWD were more likely to experience additional socioeconomic setbacks during the implementation of early COVID-19 mitigation measures.

This study adds to the growing body of literature on the effects of COVID-19 on access to services for CWD, showing significant disruption of therapeutic services. In a recent nationwide survey of 1,100 families representing 2,300 children, meeting special education needs was the second greatest challenge during COVID-19, with only 27% of caregivers noting that their child’s IEP or 504 Plan was ‘met well’ or ‘mostly met’ [16]. Caregivers of children with neurogenetic conditions also reported that the COVID-19 pandemic moderately or severely disrupted their children’s therapies, and telehealth was not meeting their needs [17]. In addition, 44% of parents surveyed reported low satisfaction with therapy services, with children who receive school-based services having less access to telehealth than those receiving services in EI or outpatient settings [18]. To fill these gaps, parents often provided therapies in place of trained therapists [19]. Taken together, it is clear that provision of services was significantly limited. Thus, the results on developmental outcomes are as of yet unknown.

It is noted that the FSS, while distributed widely across western Pennsylvania, is a non-random sample. In pooling weekly surveys over four weeks, it is possible that the same individuals responded multiple times. Chi-squared analyses were used to compare families with and without CWD, without the use of adjusted associations, as per previous FSS analyses [8]. In addition, as this study is based on self-reported data, there is the possibility of misreporting. Regarding the representation of the population of the area, the racial makeup of this study is similar to that of the region overall [20], with 81.6% of the population identifying as white. However, other studies have shown racial disparities in terms of prevalence of disability [13], which was not seen in the sample used (Table 1), although the prevalence of disability (12.8%, Table 1) falls within the range of estimates of disability among children [15]. Consequently, these results should not be considered representative of the region or national population. Furthermore, during the survey period, parents of CWD reported higher perceived stress. There is no data to compare pre-mitigation stress and no assumptions can be made about causality.

These limitations notwithstanding, the findings point to the critical need to identify and increase support for families with CWD as this pandemic and mitigation strategies evolve and in preparation for future public health emergencies. Children, particularly those who are medically vulnerable, racial and ethnic minorities, and those living in poverty, require greater support [3, 21]. As school districts evaluate strategies for in-person classes and community agencies continue remote service provision where possible, families are weighing the risks of COVID-19 exposure vs loss of needed services, further highlighting the persistent inequities in care for CWD. In addition, given the strong relationship between medical complexity and social determinants of health [22], CWD need specific attention regarding access to needed services and educational supports. It is incumbent on all of those providing these services to think critically about how to ensure that CWD maintain access to services in a way that decreases risk of exposure to COVID-19 while providing support to maintain and strengthen development.

Acknowledgments

Thank you to Dr Stacey Cook for her support of this project.

Conflict of interest

Dr. Miller receives royalties for writing content for UpToDate (Wolters Kluwer), unrelated to the content of this manuscript.

Funding

All phases of this study were supported by the Shear Family Foundation, Grable Foundation, UPMC Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh Foundation, and the University of Pittsburgh Department of Pediatrics.

References

[1] 

Patel JA , Nielsen FBH , Badiani AA , Assi S , Unadkat VA , Patel B , et al. Poverty, inequality & COVID- The forgotten vulnerable, Public Health 2020;183:110–11. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.05.006.

[2] 

Van Lancker W , Parolin Z , COVID-19, school closures, and child poverty: A social crisis in the making, Lancet Public Health 2020;5(5):e243–e244. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30084-0.

[3] 

Sholas MG , The actual and potential impact of the novel coronavirus on pediatric rehabilitation: A commentary and review of its effects and potential disparate influence on Black, Latinx and Native American marginalized populations in the United States, J Pediatr Rehab Med 2020;13(3):339–44. doi: 10.3233/PRM-200722.

[4] 

Houtrow AJ , Carle A , Perrin JM , Stein REK , Children with special healthcare needs on supplemental security income for disability have more health impacts and needs than other children with special health care needs on Medicaid, Acad Pediatr 2020;20(2):258–66. doi: 10.1016/j.aca2019.10.014.

[5] 

Arim RG , Miller AR , Guèvremont A , Lach LM , Brehaut JC , Kohen DE , Children with neurodevelopmental disorders and disabilities: a population-based study of healthcare service utilization using administrative data, Dev Med Child Neurol 2017;59(12):1284–90. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.13557.

[6] 

Houtrow AJ , Murphy N , Prescribing physical, occupational, and speech therapy services for children with disabilities, Pediatrics 2019;143(4):e0285. doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-0285.

[7] 

Jeste S , Hyde C , Distefano C , Halladay A , Ray S , Porath M , et al., Changes in access to educational and healthcare services for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities duringCOVID-19 restrictions. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2020. doi: 10.1111/jir.12776.

[8] 

Ray RN , Ettinger AK , Dwarakanath N , Mistry SV , Bey J , Chaves-Gnecco D , et al., Rapid-cycle community assessment of health-related social needs of children and families during Coronavirus Disease 2019, Acad Pediatr 2021;21(4):677–83. doi: 10.1016/j.aca2020.10.004.

[9] 

Appendix #2: Children with Special Health Care Needs (CSHCN) Screener. Baltimore: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services; 2002. Available from: https://www.childhealthdata.org/docs/cshcn/technical-summary-of-cshcn-screener.pdf.

[10] 

Cohen S , Kamarck T , Mermelstein R , A global measure of perceived stress, J Health Soc Behav 1983;24(4):385–96.

[11] 

Warttig SL , Forshaw MJ , South J , White AK , New, normative, English-sample data for the Short Form Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-4), J Health Psychol 2013;18(12):1617–28. doi: 10.1177/1359105313508346.

[12] 

Durkin MS , Maenner MJ , Benedict RE , Van Naarden Braun K , Christensen D , Kirby RS , et al., The role of socio-economic status and perinatal factors in the racial disparities in the risk of cerebral palsy, Dev Med Child Neurol 2015;57(9):835–43. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.12746.

[13] 

Houtrow AJ , Larson K , Olson LM , Newachek PW , Halfon N , Changing trends of childhood disability2001-2011, Pediatrics 2014;134(3):530–8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-0594.

[14] 

Okumura MJ , Van Cleave J , Gnanasekaran S , Houtrow AJ , Understanding factors associated with work loss for families caring for CSHCN, Pediatrics 2009;124(Suppl 4):S392–398. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-1255J.

[15] 

Hagerman TK , Houtrow AJ , Variability in prevalence estimates of disability among children in the National Survey of Children’s Health, JAMA Pediatr 2021;175(3):307–10. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.5073.

[16] 

Education and mental health during COVID-19 National Federation of Families for Children’s Mental Health; 2021. Available from: https://files.constantcontact.com/fa3e9a0a001/fc8696d3-443a-41f8-b8c9-0bf682a9ac59.pdf.

[17] 

Kowanda M , Cartner L , Kentros C , Geltzeiler AR , Singer KE , Weaver WC , et al., Availability of services and caregiver burden: Supportingindividuals with neurogenetic conditions during the COVID-19pandemic, J Child Neurol 2021;36(9):760–7. doi: 10.1177/08830738211001209.

[18] 

Murphy A , Pinkerton LM , Bruckner E , Risser HJ , The impacts of thenovel coronavirus disease on therapyservice delivery for children with disabilities, J Pediatr 2021;231:168–177.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.12.060.

[19] 

Cacioppo M , Bouvier S , Bailly R , Houx L , Lemperuer M , Mensah-Gourmel J , et al., Emerging health challenges for children with physical disabilities and their parents during the COVID-19 pandemic: The ECHO French survey, Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2021;64(3):101429. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2020.08.001.

[20] 

QuickFacts: Allegheny County, Pennsylvania; Pennsylvania. U.S Census Bureau. Available from: https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/alleghenycountypennsylvania,PA/PST045221.

[21] 

Dooley DG , Bandealy A , Tschudy MM , Low-income children and coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in the US, JAMA Pediatr 2020;174(10):922–3. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.2065.

[22] 

Berry JG , Harris D , Coller RJ , Chung PJ , Rodean J , Macy M , et al., The interwoven nature of medical and social complexity in US children, JAMA Pediatr 2020;174(9):891–3. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.0280.