Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Rabel, Constancea | Le Goff, Florianea | Lefaucheur, Romaina | Ozel, Guldena | Fetter, Damiena | Rouillé, Audreya | Maltête, Davida; b; *
Affiliations: [a] Department of Neurology, Rouen University Hospital and University of Rouen, France | [b] INSERM U1073, Rouen, France
Correspondence: [*] Correspondence to: David Maltête, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Neurology, Rouen University Hospital, 76031 Rouen Cedex, France. Tel.: +33 2 32 88 87 40; Fax: +33 2 32 88 87 41; E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: Background: Previous studies found a poor association between parkinsonian patient’s reported subjective improvement after commencing dopaminergic treatment and improvements in objective measures of motor impairment by clinician. Objective: To compare PD patient’s subjective perceived motor improvement after acute levodopa challenge test with objective motor improvement assessed by the clinician using the UPDRS part III. To analyze clinical characteristics, i.e. age, disease duration, cognitive performance or severity of axial features, that may have influenced patient’s perception. Methods: Fifty-seven consecutive PD patients (23 women, 34 men; mean age, 63.4±7.7 years) (Hoehn and Yahr off score, 2.5±0.7; mean disease duration, 11.4±4.1 years) completed the acute levodopa challenge. The percentage of improvement in motor disability, i.e. objective motor improvement, was determined with respect to the off-drug condition. Results: Bland & Altman visual analysis reveals a high degree of correlation between objective and subjective perceived motor improvement. Both the axial sub-scores in the off- and on-state (respectively, P = 0.006 and P = 0.024) and the presence of peak-dose dyskinesia (P = 0.043) significantly influence the difference between objective and subjective perceived motor improvement. Conclusions: This is the first study reporting on how PD patients assessed their motor improvement after acute levodopa challenge. These findings suggest a strong correlation between objective motor improvement assessed by the clinician using the UPDRS part III and subjective perceived motor improvement reported by the patient.
Keywords: Parkinson’s disease, subjective perception, motor improvement, acute levodopa challenge
DOI: 10.3233/JPD-160906
Journal: Journal of Parkinson's Disease, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 779-785, 2016
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]