Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Landon-Cardinal, Océanea; 1; * | Devilliers, Hervéb; 1 | Chavarot, Nathaliea | Mariampillai, Kuberakaa | Rigolet, Audea | Hervier, Baptistea | Allenbach, Yvesa | Benveniste, Oliviera
Affiliations: [a] Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Immunology, National Reference Center of Neuromuscular disorders, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France | [b] Department of Internal Medicine and Systemic Diseases, Dijon University Hospital, Dijon, France
Correspondence: [*] Correspondence to: Océane Landon-Cardinal, Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Immunology, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, 47-83 Boulevard de l’Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France. Fax: +33 1 42 16 10 58; E-mail: [email protected].
Note: [1] These authors contributed equally to this work.
Abstract: Background:Manual muscle testing has been widely used for the evaluation of muscle strength in myositis, yet less attention has been devoted to the evaluation of muscle function and endurance. Objective:Our objective was therefore to compare the responsiveness to change of muscle strength, endurance and functional testing following induction therapy for severe myositis flare (requiring high-dose corticosteroids and combined immunotherapy) in patients with a diagnosis of dermatomyositis, immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy, or overlap myositis. Methods:Muscle status was assessed at baseline and after mean 6.4±1.9 months, using the MRC-5 scale, along with endurance (Barre and Mingazzini maneuvers) and functional evaluation (e.g. chair rise) and responsiveness to change was evaluated using the Standardized Response Mean (SRM) and Standardized Mean Difference. Results:Among the 49 patients included, the strongest responsiveness to change was observed in the muscle testing of the psoas and deltoids (SRM: 1.23 and 1.16, respectively). Noticeably, endurance testing also demonstrated strong responsiveness (SRM: 1.05 and 0.96, respectively), compensating for the poor discriminatory ability of muscle testing and permitting to overcome its ceiling effect. Conclusion:Functional and endurance testing provide simple and reliable measures complementing the testing of select proximal muscle groups to evaluate responsiveness to intervention in myositis patients in daily clinical practice. Interest of functional and endurance testing should be evaluated prospectively as outcome measures in myositis clinical trials.
Keywords: Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, myositis, manual muscle testing, responsiveness, endurance, functional evaluation, outcome measures
DOI: 10.3233/JND-180358
Journal: Journal of Neuromuscular Diseases, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 99-107, 2019
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]