Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Glenn, T.a; b; * | Ross, K.R.a; b | Trembath, A.c | Tatsuoka, C.d | Minich, N.b | Hibbs, A.M.a; b
Affiliations: [a] Department of Pediatrics, UH Rainbow Babies and Children’s Hospital, Cleveland, OH, USA | [b] Department of Pediatrics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA | [c] Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA | [d] Department of Neurology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
Correspondence: [*] Address for correspondence: Tara Glenn, MD, 11100 Euclid Avenue, MS 6010, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA. Tel.: +1 216 844 3387; Fax: +1 216 844 3380; E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: BACKGROUND:Oxygen exposure has been associated with increased wheezing and respiratory morbidity after discharge in extremely preterm infants and those with bronchopulmonary dysplasia. More mature preterm infants with less severe disease are also at risk for pulmonary complications, including rehospitalization for respiratory illnesses and wheezing disorders. Our aim was to evaluate associations between respiratory support and morbidity in preterm infants without bronchopulmonary dysplasia. METHODS:A secondary analysis was performed on 300 infants born at 28–34 weeks gestation without bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Exposure included oxygen or positive pressure, (continuous positive airway pressure or mechanical ventilation). The primary outcome was recurrent wheezing. Secondary outcomes were respiratory medications, emergency room visits, and hospitalizations. RESULTS:50% of infants who received oxygen experienced recurrent wheezing compared to 42.4% of infants who did not (OR 1.15 CI 0.72–1.85 adjusted OR 1.15 CI 0.67–1.98). 51.1% of infants who received positive pressure experienced recurrent wheezing compared to 38.1% who did not (OR 1.57 CI 0.97–2.53 adjusted OR 1.58 CI 0.90–2.77). There were no significant associations between oxygen and positive pressure exposure and any primary or secondary outcomes in the adjusted analyses. CONCLUSIONS:After adjustment for known risk factors the analyses showed no significant associations between oxygen and positive pressure with respiratory morbidity in this population. Further study of infants with mild disease is needed.
Keywords: Wheezing, prematurity, oxygen, positive pressure
DOI: 10.3233/NPM-190217
Journal: Journal of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 189-195, 2020
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]