Affiliations: [a] School of Economics and Management, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu, Anhui, China
| [b] Yangtze River Delta Development Research Institute, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu, Anhui, China
Correspondence:
[*]
Corresponding author. Shuli Liu, Yangtze River Delta Development Research Institute, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu 241000, Anhui, China. E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) is one of the most effective means for potential systematic risk assessment in a real work environment. Nevertheless, the traditional FMEA approach has been extensively criticized for many deficiencies in coping with risk evaluation and prioritization problems under inter-uncertain environments. To overcome the limitations, in this paper, a synthesized risk priority calculation framework is proposed for FMEA by combining the gained and lost dominance score (GLDS) method, the combination ordered weighted averaging (C-OWA) operator, and Fermatean fuzzy set (FFS). Firstly, we use FFS to express the experts’ uncertain risk evaluation information which can depict the fuzziness and ambiguity of the information. Secondly, the C-OWA operator combined with FFS is introduced to build the group risk matrix which can provide a more reasonable risk analysis result. Then, the developed GLDS method with FFS is presented to calculate the risk priority of each failure mode which takes both individual and group risk attitudes into consideration. Finally, a medical device risk analysis case is introduced to demonstrate the proposed FMEA framework. We also perform comparison analyses to confirm the effectiveness and rationality of the hybrid risk prioritization framework for FMEA under a complex and uncertain situation.
