Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Mariyam, Farhanaa | Mehfuz, Shabanaa | Sadiq, Mohd.b; *
Affiliations: [a] Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Jamia Millia Islamia (A Central University), New Delhi, India | [b] Software Engineering Laboratory, Computer Engineering Section, UPFET, Jamia Millia Islamia (A Central University), New Delhi, India
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author. Mohd. Sadiq, Software Engineering Laboratory, Computer Engineering Section, UPFET, Jamia Millia Islamia (A Central University), New Delhi-110025, India. E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: Goal oriented software requirements analysis method is used for the analysis of elicited functional goals (FGs) and non-functional goals (NFGs) of a system in which goals are decomposed and refined into sub-goals until requirements from the sub-goals are identified. Based on the critical analysis, we found that most of the attention of goal-oriented methods is on the crisp and fuzzy logic during the analysis of the software goals or requirements. In these methods’ prior information about the type of membership function is required; and the selection of membership function depends on the subjective justification. As a result, it lacks objectivity and may affect the ranking values of the goals or requirements during the analysis. Therefore, this paper presents a rough attributed goal-oriented software requirements analysis (RAGOSRA) method in which rough preference matrix has been used to capture the opinions of different stakeholders. The results of the RAGOSRA method are compared by considering the following criteria, i.e., goal types, goal links, types of data used in the analysis, stakeholder perceptions and time complexity with some fuzzy based methods. Based on the time complexity analysis, it is found that RAGOSRA method requires only 24 operations for the selection of goals for the dataset having 3 NFGs and 4 FGs of an institute examination system. On the other hand, FAGOSRA method, fuzzy TOPSIS method, and fuzzy AHP method requires 36, 166, and 240 operations respectively.
Keywords: Requirements engineering, goal-oriented requirements engineering, software requirements analysis, multi-criteria decision-making method, rough-set theory, institute examination system
DOI: 10.3233/JIFS-221300
Journal: Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 7833-7843, 2023
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]