Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Song, Juana; b | Ni, Zhiweia; b; * | Jin, Feifeic | Wu, Wenyinga; b | Li, Pinga; b; d
Affiliations: [a] School of Management, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, China | [b] Key Laboratory of Process Optimization andIntelligent Decision-Making, Ministry of Education, Hefei, China | [c] School of Business, Anhui University, Hefei, Anhui, China | [d] School of Information Engineering, Fuyang NormalUniversity, Fuyang, China
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author. Zhiwei Ni, School of Management, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China. Tel.: +86 15055402934; E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: Probabilistic dual hesitant fuzzy sets (PDHFSs) have good flexibility and integrity in expressing fuzzy and uncertain information. However, some crucial problems related to PDHFSs remain unsolved, such as how to define probabilistic dual hesitant fuzzy preference relations (PDHFPRs) and solve group decision-making (GDM) problems with PDHFPRs. This paper establishes the concept of PDHFPRs and investigates consensus-based GDM methods with PDHFPRs. First, a new distance measure is proposed to quantify the difference between two PDHFPRs, which does not increase the virtual elements of membership and non-membership degrees, and can contain all distance combination of membership and non-membership elements. Therefore, the distance calculation results are not affected by the subjectivity of decision-makers (DMs). Second, the consensus measures for PDHFPRs are proposed, which are effective tool to measure the consensus level among DMs. Moreover, two consensus-based GDM methods are proposed, which can improve the group consensus level for PDHFPRs by changing the PDHFPR with the worst consensus level or modifying the weights of DMs. Finally, the proposed methods are applied to the location selection of large-scale industrial solid waste treatment facilities. The comparison with existing methods illustrates the validity and feasibility of the proposed methods.
Keywords: Group decision-making, probabilistic dual hesitant fuzzy preference relations, distance measure, consensus
DOI: 10.3233/JIFS-210796
Journal: Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 2111-2128, 2021
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]