Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Azimifar, Maryama | Nejatian, Samadb; * | Parvin, Hamidc; * | Bagherifard, Karamollaha | Rezaei, Vahidehd
Affiliations: [a] Department of Computer Science, Yasooj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Yasooj, IR | [b] Department of Electrical Engineering, Yasooj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Yasooj, IR | [c] Department of Computer Science, Nourabad Mamasani Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mamasani, IR | [d] Department of Mathematics, Yasooj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Yasooj, IR
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author. Samad Nejatian, Department of Electrical Engineering, Yasooj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Yasooj, IR. E-mail: [email protected] and Hamid Parvin, Department of Computer Science, Nourabad Mamasani Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mamasani, IR. E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: We introduce a semi-supervised space adjustment framework in this paper. In the introduced framework, the dataset contains two subsets: (a) training data subset (space-one data (SOD)) and (b) testing data subset (space-two data (STD)). Our semi-supervised space adjustment framework learns under three assumptions: (I) it is assumed that all data points in the SOD are labeled, and only a minority of the data points in the STD are labeled (we call the labeled space-two data as LSTD), (II) the size of LSTD is very small comparing to the size of SOD, and (III) it is also assumed that the data of SOD and the data of STD have different distributions. We denote the unlabeled space-two data by ULSTD, which is equal to STD - LSTD. The aim is to map the training data, i.e., the data from the training labeled data subset and those from LSTD (note that all labeled data are considered to be training data, i.e., SOD ∪ LSTD) into a shared space (ShS). The mapped SOD, ULSTD, and LSTD into ShS are named MSOD, MULSTD, and MLSTD, respectively. The proposed method does the mentioned mapping in such a way that structures of the data points in SOD and MSOD, in STD and MSTD, in ULSTD and MULSTD, and in LSTD and MLSTD are the same. In the proposed method, the mapping is proposed to be done by a principal component analysis transformation on kernelized data. In the proposed method, it is tried to find a mapping that (a) can maintain the neighbors of data points after the mapping and (b) can take advantage of the class labels that are known in STD during transformation. After that, we represent and formulate the problem of finding the optimal mapping into a non-linear objective function. To solve it, we transform it into a semidefinite programming (SDP) problem. We solve the optimization problem with an SDP solver. The examinations indicate the superiority of the learners trained in the data mapped by the proposed approach to the learners trained in the data mapped by the state of the art methods.
Keywords: Semi-supervised domain adaptation, non-linear optimization, local-preserving domain adaptation, semidefinite programming, kernel learning, principal component analysis
DOI: 10.3233/JIFS-200224
Journal: Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 3043-3057, 2023
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]