Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Su, Hongshenga; * | Wang, Dantinga | Su, Lanb
Affiliations: [a] School of Automation and Electrical Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou, China | [b] School of Finance, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing, China
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author. Hongsheng Su, School of Automation and Electrical Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, China. Tel.: (+86)13919079196; E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: In view of defects that traditional Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP) cannot accurately describe the ambiguity and randomness of the assessment, and as well as inconsistency existed in judgment process, in this paper a novel risk evaluation method is proposed using Fuzzy Failure Modes Effects and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) based on could model. The method firstly applies FMECA to identify the risk, and then uses FAHP to determine the subjection degree function with cloud model based. In the end, the group decision can be conducted with the synthetically aggregated cloud model, which can be directly observed through the distribution of the cloud pictures. Compared with traditional FAHP, the relevant practical examples in Chinese train control (CTC) systems show that the results of the two possess difference due to their original data coming from different 20-expert questionnaires, the reason is found that there exists inconsistence in 20-expert questionnaires on FAHP via t-examination method. Hence, though another 20-expert questionnaires and after inconsistence test, we obtain consistent result in both methods, but the Fuzzy-FMECA with cloud model based could implement the transformation between exact value and quantized one by incorporating the ambiguity and randomness, and provide more abundant information than subjection degree function of the conventional FAHP method, and possesses better consistency, and is a feasible and more effective decision method. In addition, the correlation coefficient method and center-of-gravity method are also applied to verify the correctness and effectiveness of the proposed method, and such that it can be widely applied to solve real-world practical issues.
Keywords: Risk, fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP), cloud model, Chinese train control(CTC) systems, t-examination, validation
DOI: 10.3233/JIFS-182745
Journal: Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 1299-1309, 2019
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]