Affiliations: [a] Department of Computer Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India
| [b] Department of Computer Science, South Asian University, New Delhi, India
| [c] Faculty of Computer Science, Benemerita Universidad Autonoma de Puebla, Puebla, Mexico
Correspondence:
[*]
Corresponding author. Vivek Kumar Singh, Department of Computer Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India. E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: Classification of research articles into different subject areas is an extremely important task in bibliometric analysis and information retrieval. There are primarily two kinds of subject classification approaches used in different academic databases: journal-based (aka source-level) and article-based (aka publication-level). The two popular academic databases- Web of Science and Scopus- use journal-based subject classification scheme for articles, which assigns articles into a subject based on the subject category assigned to the journal in which they are published. On the other hand, the recently introduced Dimensions database is the first large academic database that uses article-based subject classification scheme that assigns the article to a subject category based on its contents. Though the subject classification schemes of Web of Science have been compared in several studies, no research studies have been done on comparison of the article-based and journal-based subject classification systems in different academic databases. This paper aims to compare the accuracy of subject classification system of the three popular academic databases: Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions through a large-scale user-based study. Results show that the commonly held belief of superiority of article-based subject classification over the journal-based subject classification scheme does not hold at least at the moment, as Web of Science appears to have the most accurate subject classification.
Keywords: Academic databases, research category, subject classification
