Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Faizi, Shahzada | Rashid, Tabasamb; * | Zafar, Sohailb
Affiliations: [a] Department of Mathematics, Virtual University of Pakistan, Lahore, Pakistan | [b] Department of Mathematics, University of Management and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author. Tabasam Rashid, Department of Mathematics, University of Management and Technology, Lahore 54770, Pakistan. E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: This paper develops an hesitant 2-tuple linguistic preference relation (H2TLPR) in which the pairwise comparisons are represented by hesitant 2-tuple linguistic sets (H2TLSs) and then, uses the additive consistency concept for linguistic fuzzy preference relations to give an additive consistency definition for H2TLPRs. Two iterative optimization methods, namely, feedback optimization method (FOM) and automatic optimization method (AOM) are proposed to obtain a solution with a desired consistency index of H2TLPR. In the FOM, the decision makers (DMs) are suggested to give their new preference values in a specific range. If the DMs/experts are unwilling to offer their updated preferences, the AOM is proposed to carry out the consistency improvement process. A score H2TLPR is proposed, and then introduced hesitant 2-tuple linguistic weighted averaging (H2TLWA) operator for the aggregation of H2TLPRs. Furthermore, the quantifier-guided dominance degrees are used to obtain hesitant 2-tuple linguistic ordered weighted averaging (H2TLOWA) operator weights. Finally, a case study is carried out, showing the potentials of the methodology by using the H2TLPRs and the optimization methods, and evaluating the selection of a best investment company that’s interested in the construction of one of the main infrastructure project of China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC).
Keywords: Hesitant 2-tuple linguistic set, Score function, Additive consistency, Iterative optimization methods, Group decision making.
DOI: 10.3233/JIFS-172152
Journal: Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 4657-4672, 2018
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]