Anthocyanin content, bioactive compounds and physico-chemical characteristics of potential new strawberry cultivars rich in-anthocyanins
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
High anthocyanin content and the presence of other bioactive compounds are attractive characteristics of strawberry fruits for healthy consumption.
OBJECTIVES:
To characterize the anthocyanin content and the presence of other bioactive compounds, including anthocyanin (total and predominant types) andantioxidant activity; and to determine the physico-chemical fruit quality parameters of two new strawberry cultivars.
METHOD:
Fruits of two new hybrids were extracted and total anthocyanin and antioxidant activity were determined usinga UV-Vis spectrophotometer. Individual anthocyanins and vitamin C were measured using an HPLC. Physico-chemical characteristics of fruits were analyzed.
RESULTS:
Hybrid No. 4 line 5 and hybrid No. 4 line 26 are two potential new strawberry cultivars that are rich in anthocyanins. The total anthocyanin contents of these two hybrids were approximately 31–38 mg/100 g FW with no significant differences between them. Cyanidin 3-glucoside and pelargonidin 3-glucoside were foundat amounts of approximately 15–24 mg/kgFW and 332–478 mg/kg FW, respectively. Total phenolic compounds and FRAP activity of the two hybrids were approximately 2295–2579 mg GAE/kgFWand 27–30 mmol Fe2 +/kg FW, respectively.
CONCLUSION:
The two new hybrid strawberry lines, hybrid No. 4 line 5 and No. 4 line 26, when compared to the parents, had higher levels of bioactive compounds, especially anthocyanins, total phenolics, and FRAP, together with improved physico-chemical quality, and higher vitamin C content. These results indicate a considerable potential of these hybrids for commercial cultivation in Thailand and other production regions.
1Introduction
Highconsumption of fruit and vegetables is considered an effective way to increase the intake of bioactive compounds and to enhance the nutritional values of a human diet. Berry fruits, especially strawberry, represent one of the most important sources of bioactive compounds with high antioxidant capacity. Therefore, increasing the consumption of berries that are high in ‘healthy compounds’ seems to be an appropriate strategy for improving human health [1].
Presently, strawberries are one of the most popular fruits in the world [2] since they are valued for flavor, fragrance and richness in natural bioactive compounds, especially anthocyanins. Anthocyanins play an important role in color of the berries, while lowering the risk of cardiovascular disease, and reducing the risk of cancer in humans [3]. Moreover, they can reverse age-related neurodegenerative decline [4], improve gluco regulation [5, 6], protect brain tissue from hypoxia [7], improve visual functions [8], and protect against DNA damage [9]. In addition, it has been shown that a diet rich in these bioactive compounds may prevent hyperlipidemia [10], inhibit antimutagenic activity [11], stimulatethe production of insulin in pancreatic cells [5], protect against liver damage [12], and reduce inflammation and oxidative stress in the brain leading to beneficial effects against neurodegenerative processes such as Parkinson’s or Alzheimer’s disease [13].
Anthocyanins are well-known polyphenolic compounds and quantitatively the most important in strawberry [14]. The two major anthocyanin compounds in strawberry are pelargonidin-3-glucoside (89–95% of total anthocyanin content) and cyanidin-3-glucoside (3.9–10.6%) [15, 16]. Breeding programs have been typically focused on developing new and improved cultivars for specific agronomic, qualitative and sensorial traits. However, the interest in breeding cultivars with specific health-related phytochemicals is increasing. This development of phytochemically rich fruits can potentially benefit not just consumers but may also benefit farmers and processors through increased returns for higher-value products [17].
In Thailand, strawberries are widely grown in the northern provinces under cool weather at high elevation including in Chiangmai, Chiangrai and other provinces of northern Thailand. The most popular strawberry cultivars include Praratchatan No. 50, Praratchatan No. 72 and Akihime, which are highly desired by consumers. Provided that these cultivars have standout features such as good aroma, sweetness, redness, firmness and high yield, they are attractive for being consumed both fresh and processed [18]. However, strawberry cultivars in Thailand generally have a low anthocyanin content [19] and until now, there has not been anyresearch that specifically focuses on the development of cultivars that are high in anthocyanin. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the anthocyanin content, the antioxidant activity of bioactive compounds and the physico-chemical characteristics of fruit of two new potential new strawberry cultivars that would enhance the quality and nutritional value of this fruit in Thailand.
2Materials and methods
2.1Chemicals
All chemical reagents for antioxidant activity analysis, including folin-Ciocalteu reagent, sodium carbonate (anhydrous), 3,4,5-trihydroxybenzoic acid (gallic acid), sodium hydroxide, sodium acetate trihydrate, glacial acetic acid, 6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchromane-2-carboxylic acid (Trolox), hydrochloric acid, 2,4,6-tripyridyl-s-triazine (TPTZ),and Iron(III) chloride hexahydrate, were purchased fromat Sigma-Aldrich (USA). For HPLC analysis, HPLC grade ortho-phosphoric acid, potassium dihydrogen phosphate, meta-phosphoric acid, ascorbic acid, water, methanol, ethanol and acetonitrile, were used. Anthocyanins standards, including pelargonidin 3-glucoside and cyanidin 3-glucoside, were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Switzerland).
2.2Source of strawberry cultivars
2.2.1Parent cultivars
Sixty mature plantlets from crosses between three parental strawberry cultivars were obtained from The Royal Project Foundation, Chiangmai, northern Thailand (latitude: 18.812369, longitude: 98.884381) and cultivated in plastic pots (20 plantlets per cultivar). These plantlets were maintained under approximately 18.8°C and 64.3% RH ina greenhouse at the Highland Agricultural Research and Development Center, Khao Kho, Phetchabun, lower northern Thailand (latitude: 16.588400, longitude: 100.960130).
2.2.2The breeding process, selection and cultivation of hybrid strawberry lines
The new hybrid strawberries were developed at The Highland Agricultural Research and Development Center, Khao Kho. This program involved nine cross combinations (Table 1).
Table 1
List of the strawberry parents involved in the cross combinations for the study of fruit nutritional quality
| Hybrid pair number | Progenitors | ||
| Female | Male | ||
| 1 | Praratchatan No. 50 | × | Praratchatan No. 50 |
| 2 | Praratchatan No. 72 | × | Praratchatan No. 50 |
| 3 | Akihime | × | Praratchatan No. 50 |
| 4 | Praratchatan No. 50 | × | Praratchatan No. 72 |
| 5 | Praratchatan No. 72 | × | Praratchatan No. 72 |
| 6 | Akihime | × | Praratchatan No. 72 |
| 7 | Praratchatan No. 50 | × | Akihime |
| 8 | Praratchatan No. 72 | × | Akihime |
| 9 | Akihime | × | Akihime |
Each hybrid pair of strawberry was crossed using ten flowers of each cultivar using standard methods. Seeds from ripe fruits from each cross were separated using a blender [20]. The seeds were air-dried at room temperature for one month, chilled at 4°C for a month and then placed on a piece of moist filter paper in Petri dishes. A 2% metalaxyl fungicide solutionwas sprayed on the seeds for disease control.
A total of 2,700 seeds of nine hybrid pairs were selected and cultivated in peat moss containing plastic trays at approximately 25°/22°C (day/night) and 71.2% RH, for 5 months in a greenhouse at Faculty of Agriculture Natural Resources and Environment, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand (latitude: 16.746360, longitude: 100.196050). From the initial seeds, 1,591 vigorous hybrids were selected for growing on.
These plantlets were transferred a greenhouse at 15°C and 80% RH at Doi Wawee, Chiangrai, north Thailand (latitude: 19.917925, longitude: 99.495306), where 10 fruits from each of the parents and from the hybrid strawberry lines were collected at the full maturity stage (30 day after anthesis) during the season, from the beginning of January to the end of March 2017. Samples were collected, placed in plastic PE cold bags (size 4×6 cm) and stored at –20°Cuntil the samples were analyzed at the laboratory (Department of Agricultural Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture Natural Resources and Environment, Naresuan University). Ten fruit samples were individually analyzed for anthocyanin content, antioxidant activity of bioactive compounds and for determining physico-chemical characteristics.
2.3Anthocyanin content analysis of strawberry fruits
2.3.1Total anthocyanin content
Strawberry fruit peel was extracted for total anthocyanins analysis as previously described [21] with some modifications. Anthocyanin was extracted from the fruit peel (2 g) by homogenizing the peel with 5 ml HCl (1%) methanol solution. The extract was filtered through a piece of number 1 filter paper (Whatman™ diam. 110 mm). A 5 ml sample of the supernatant was measured for absorbance at 520 nm, using a UV mini-1240 UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Japan). Total anthocyanin content was expressed as milligrams of pelargonidin-3-glucoside equivalents per 100 g fresh weight.
2.3.2Content of individual anthocyanins
Individual anthocyanins, including cyanidin-3-glucoside and pelargonidin-3-glucoside were analyzed as previously described [22] with slight modifications. A 0.1 g sample of freeze-dried strawberry powder was extracted with 5 ml acidified methanol (0.1% HCl in MeOH). The 5 ml aliquots from each sample were dried down in a Labconco Centrivap Concentrator at 30°C (Labconco, Kansas City, MO, USA). The samples were then resuspended with 0.1% HCl in MeOH (1000μl) and passed through a 0.45μm Nylon Syringe Filter prior to analysis by HPLC. A 60μl sample was analyzed using a Shimadzu analytical HPLC system (Isocratic system) incorporating a specific column (Inertsil®ODS-3 5μm 4.6×250 mm, guard column Inertsil®ODS-3 4.0×10 mm). The mobile phase consisted of acetonitrile + 0.1% formic acid (A solution), and acetonitrile/water/formic acid (5 : 94.9 : 0.1) (B solution). The elution profile that consisted of a linear gradient from solvent A was 0% at zero time and ramped linearly to 20% at 20 min, 30% at 26 min, 50% at 28.5 min, 50% at 28.5 min, 95% at 32 min and back to 0% at 35 min. The total run time was 35 min. The monitoring was performed using a 520 Photodiode Array Detector (PDA) at a flow rate of 0.8 ml/min and a column temperature of 35°C. Anthocyanin was quantified and identified using external Cy-3-glc and Pg-3-glc calibration curves and calculated as milligrams per kilogram fresh weight (mg/kg FW).
2.4Bioactive compounds analysis of strawberry fruits
2.4.1Total phenolic content analysis (TPC)
Total phenolic content was determined using the Folin-Ciocalteu assay [23]. The extraction procedure was carried out as described previously [17, 24] with some modifications. A 100 mg sample of strawberry powder was initially extracted with 3 ml of extracting solution (80% MeOH, 19% H2O and 1% formic acid). The mixture was vortex mixed for 2 h in darkness and under cold (4°C) conditions and then shaken at 300 rpm under the same conditions. The extracts were then centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 15 min at 8°C. The supernatant was re-extracted with a further 2 ml of the extracting solution. This supernatant was combined with the first supernatant and stored at –20°C before analysis. The combined supernatant of fruit extracts was directly assayed at 750 nm, using a UV mini-1240 UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Japan) with gallic acid serving as a standard. Results were expressed as milligrams of gallic acid equivalents per kilogram fresh weight (mg GAE/kg FW).
2.4.2Ferric reducing antioxidant power analysis (FRAP)
The FRAP assay was carried out as described previously [25], with minor modifications. The extraction procedure was conducted using the same procedure as described for total phenolic analysis. The supernatant extract was directly determined at 595 nm, using a UV mini-1240 UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Japan). FRAP values were obtained by comparing the absorption values of the samples against those obtained from a calibration curve provided by iron (II) sulfate heptahydrate as the reference standard. All values were calculated as millimoles of Fe2 + equivalents per kilogram fresh weight of strawberry (mmol Fe2 + /kg FW).
2.5Physico-chemical analysis of strawberry fruits
2.5.1Size, weight, firmness and color
At each sampling, the fruit width, length (using a vernier caliper) and fruit fresh weight (by fine balance) were measured. Firmness was measured using a texture analyzer (model QTS 25, Brookfield, USA) and expressed in Newtons (N) according to the modified method [21]. The peel and flesh color of the fruit were assessed using a colorimeter (CR-20, Minolta Co., Tokyo, Japan) and expressed as L*, a*, b* and hue angle values. The colour of the outer whole fruit at a central point on the fruit circumference was measured. For inner flesh colour, the fruits were cut into a half longitudinal section and then measured (duplicate measurements per fruits).
2.5.2HPLC determination of vitamin C content
Vitamin C (ascorbic acid) analysis was assessed using an HPLC according to a modified method [27], using a specific column (Inertsil®ODS-3 5μm 4.6×150 mm with guard column Inertsil®ODS-3 4.0×10 mm, Shimadzu analytical) (Isocratic system), a UV detector 244–262 nm, with a mobile phase: 3 mM potassium dihydrogen phosphate in 0.35% v/v ortho-phosphoric acid, and a flow rate of 0.8 ml/min. Each 10 g sample was cut into small pieces, wrapped in cheesecloth, and squeezed by hand. A 2 ml of the clear juice sample was then diluted with 2 ml 3% meta-phosphoric acid, filtered through a 0.45μm Nylon Syringe Filter before a 60μl sample was injected into the HPLC system at a column temperature 40°C. Ascorbic acid was quantified using an L-ascorbic acid calibration curve. The values were calculated as milligrams per kilogram fresh weight (mg/kg FW).
2.5.3Total soluble solids content, titratable acidity, pH, soluble solids content to titratable acidity
Total soluble solids content (TSS), titratable acidity (TA) and pH were determined as described previously [26]. A 10 g portion of fruit was cut into small pieces and hand squeezed through cheesecloth. The clear juice was used for analysis. Juice TSS was measured with a pocket refractometer (PAL-1, Atago, Japan) and expressed as a percentage (%). TA was determined by dilutingeach 2 ml aliquot of strawberry juice in 40 ml distilled water and titrating to pH 8.2 with 0.1 NNaOH using an automatic titrator (East Plus Titation, Mettler Toledo). The results were expressed as the percentage equivalentof citric acid. The ratio of soluble solids content to titratable acidity was calculated. Juice pH was measured with a pH meter (Satorious, Docu pH Meter).
2.6Morphological characteristics of plant and strawberry fruits
After anthocyanin-rich strawberry hybrids were selected, they were subjected to micropropagation and cultivation. The morphological characteristics of plants and fruits were recorded with digital camera (Panasonic Model No. DMC-TZ30 Panasonic Co., Japan). Triplicate fruits per line were measured.
2.7Data and statistical analysis
Data were analyzed using SPSS software version 17.0 for determining the analysis of variance (p < 0.05). Differences among treatment means were analyzed using Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT) at p < 0.05.
3Results
3.1Total anthocyanin content
Two plants, each from one of the nine hybrid pairs, were found to have anthocyanin concentrations up to two-fold higher than either their parents or Akihime (p < 0.05). These were hybrid No. 4 line 5 and hybrid No. 4 line 26. Strawberries from the crosses where Akihime was a parent had the lowest anthocyanin concentrations (Table 2).
Table 2
Comparison of two strawberry hybrids and the parents for total anthocyanin content in the fruit
| Cultivars | Line | Total anthocyanin content (mg/100gFW) |
| Parental | ||
| Praratchatan No. 50 | – | 20.80±0.10b1/ |
| Praratchatan No. 72 | – | 19.18±0.17b |
| Akihime | – | 15.57±0.20b |
| Hybrid strawberry | ||
| Praratchatan No. 50×Praratchatan No. 72 | 5 | 38.49±0.13a |
| Praratchatan No. 50×Praratchatan No. 72 | 26 | 31.68±0.11a |
1/Means values (±SD); n = 10; different superscripted lowercase letters within the column indicate significant difference (p < 0.05).
3.2Individual anthocyanins and bioactive compounds analysis
Values of cyanidin-3-glucoside (Cy-3-glc), total phenolics and FRAP were typically significantly higherin the two selected hybrid lines than in the parents and Akihime. Pg-3-glcand Cy-3-glc were major components found in these strawberry fruits (Fig. 1). Pg-3-glc values were the highest in hybrid No. 4 line 26 but the lowest in hybrid No. 4 line 5. Within the parents, Akihime consistently had the lowest values, and Praratchatan No. 50 the highest (Table 3 and Fig. 1).
Table 3
Anthocyanins (Pg-3-glc, Cy-3-glc), total phenolics and FRAP concentrations in the assessed parental strawberry cultivars and in two selected hybrid strawberry lines
| Parental/Hybrid pairs | Line | Pg-3-glc (mg/kgFW) | Cy-3-glc (mg/kg FW) | Total phenolics (mg GAE/kg FW) | FRAP (mmol Fe2 + /kgFW) |
| Praratchatan No. 50 | – | 294.72±0.24c1/ | 12.92±0.17d1/ | 1940.65±0.28d1/ | 16.11±0.26d1/ |
| Praratchatan No. 72 | – | 132.66±0.12d | 17.43±0.19b | 2071.55±0.22c | 17.75±0.14c |
| Akihime | – | 99.12±0.15e | 10.52±0.23e | 1601.40±0.21e | 14.96±0.18e |
| Praratchatan No. 50×Praratchatan No. 72 | 5 | 478.15±0.11a | 15.10±0.12c | 2579.12±0.08a | 30.24±0.25a |
| Praratchatan No. 50×Praratchatan No. 72 | 26 | 332.28±0.06b | 24.90±0.16a | 2295.73±0.13b | 27.96±0.17b |
1/Means values (±SD); n = 10; with the different superscripted in lowercase letter within the same column are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Fig. 1
Anthocyanin-rich profile of hybrid strawberry fruits; (a) Praratchatan No. 50×Praratchatan No. 72 line 5, (b) Praratchatan No. 50×Praratchatan No. 72 line 26 determined by HPLC. Peak identification was as follows; (1) cyanidin 3-glucoside, (2) unknown 1, (3) pelargonidin 3-glucoside, (4) unknown 2, (5) unknown 3, (6) unknown 4.
3.3Fruit size, weight, firmness and color
Fruit size, weight and firmness were highest in hybrid No. 4 line 26, with significant differences compared to parents and other hybrids (Table 4). The L*, b* and hue angle values for both the peel and flesh of fruit from both hybrid No. 4 line 5 and hybrid No. 4 line 26 were typically lower, and a* values higher, than those values for the parental lines. Differences among the parental lines were small and inconsistent (Table 6). However, L*, a*, b* and hue angle of peel and flesh from fruits of the two lines were significantly different from those of Akihime.
Table 4
Physico-chemical quality of parental and two lines of strawberry cultivars
| Parental/Hybrid pairs | Line | Fruit width (cm) | Fruit length (cm) | Fruit fresh weight (g/fruit) | Firmness (N) | Total soluble solids (%) | Titratable acidity (%) | TSS/TA | pH |
| Praratchatan No. 50 | – | 3.03±0.28b1/ | 5.53±0.23a1/ | 16.50±0.14ab1/ | 2.64±0.10b1/ | 9.86±0.13ab1/ | 0.74±0.20c1/ | 13.19±0.19b1/ | 3.82±0.22b1/ |
| Praratchatan No. 72 | – | 2.38±0.20c | 3.13±0.15c | 14.29±0.29ab | 3.17±0.22ab | 8.86±0.15ab | 0.84±0.23b | 10.51±0.21bc | 3.71±0.26c |
| Akihime | – | 2.70±0.17bc | 4.36±0.18b | 13.12±0.12b | 1.20±0.24c | 7.26±0.29c | 1.15±0.27a | 6.37±0.12c | 3.62±0.18d |
| Praratchatan No. 50× | 5 | 3.56±0.15a | 5.78±0.13a | 16.71±0.17a | 4.11±0.06a | 11.00±0.11a | 0.40±0.16d | 27.27±0.04a | 3.91±0.19a |
| Praratchatan No. 72 | |||||||||
| Praratchatan No. 50× | 26 | 3.87±0.14a | 5.93±0.05a | 17.33±0.08a | 4.14±0.18a | 11.13±0.10a | 0.36±0.07d | 30.35±0.09a | 3.53±0.11e |
| Praratchatan No. 72 |
1/Means values (±SD); n = 10;with the different superscripted in lowercase letter within the same column are significantly different (p < 0.05).
3.4Total soluble solids content, titratable acidity, ratio (TSS/TA) and pH
Fruit from hybrid No. 4 line 26 had the highest TSS content and the lowest TA, hence the highest ratio (p < 0.05). The two hybrids had different physico-chemical characteristics, especially a higher ratio (27.2–30.3) than either the parents or Akihime (Table 4).
The pH of hybrid No. 4 line 5 was significantly different from hybrid line 26, the parents or Akihime. The hybrid No. 4 line 26 had the lowest value while hybrid No. 4 line 5 had the highest (Table 4).
3.5Vitamin C content
Hybrid No. 4 line 5 and hybrid No. 4 line 26 both had higher values (p < 0.05) of vitamin C content when compared to the parents orAkihime. The amounts of vitamin C in lines 5 and 26 were between 81.0 and 82.5 mg/100 g FW (Table 5).
Table 5
Vitamin C content of parental and two lines of strawberry cultivars
| Parental/Hybrid pairs | Line | Vitamin C(mg/kg FW) |
| Praratchatan No. 50 | – | 70.71±0.11c1/ |
| Praratchatan No. 72 | – | 77.85±0.14b |
| Akihime | – | 42.42±0.12d |
| Praratchatan No. 50×Praratchatan No. 72 | 5 | 82.51±0.07a |
| Praratchatan No. 50×Praratchatan No. 72 | 26 | 81.04±0.10a |
1/Means values (±SD); n = 10; with the different superscripted in lowercase letter within the same column are significantly different (p < 0.05).
3.6Morphological characteristics of plant and strawberry fruits
Fruit shapes were long conic in hybrid lines 5 and 26. Fruit size tended to be slightly smaller in line 5 compared to line 26 (Fig. 2). Both hybrids had larger fruit than their parents or Akihime (p < 0.05) (Table 4).
Fig. 2
Morphological characteristics of plants and fruits of (a,b) hybrid No. 4 line 5; (c,d) hybrid No. 4 line 26.
4Discussion
Strawberry breeding programs have previously been mainly focused on the improvement of agronomic and qualitativetraits, and disease resistance. Recently,however, breeders have become increasingly interested in developing new cultivars focused on sensorial and nutritional characteristics for human health [1, 17, 28].
The results show that hybrid No. 4 line 5 and hybrid No. 4 line 26 had higher total anthocyanin content than either of their parents or Akihime (Table 2). The concentrations of total anthocyanin in these two new hybrid cultivars were higher than those in 27 strawberry cultivars grown in Norway [29], and approximately two times higher than that in 15 strawberry genotypes selected from a breeding program in British Columbia and Canada [30].
The results indicate that hybrid No. 4 line 5 and hybrid No. 4 line 26 have the potential to be used in the development of phytochemically rich strawberry cultivars. The hybrid No. 4 line 26 produced approximately 24.9 mg/kg FW of Cy-3-glc, which was five-fold higher than in ‘Sugarbaby’, reported as a high anthocyanin-containing strawberry cultivar [17]. In addition, hybrid No. 4 line 5 produced approximately 15.1 mg/kg FW of Cy-3-glc, which is almost fifteen-fold higher thanin either ‘Seyhun’ or ‘Osmanli’ [31].
For Pg-3-glc content, the hybrid No. 4 line 26 and hybrid No. 4 line 5 produced 332.2 and 478.1 mg/kg FW, respectively(Table 3 and Fig. 1), which was higher than that reported in ‘Camarosa’, ‘Seyhun’, ‘Osmanli’ and ‘Tudnew’ [31, 32].
There are more than two types of individual anthocyanin (Cy-3-glc, Pg-3-glc) in strawberry fruits (Fig. 1), which should be further investigated. However, anthocyanin content has been shown to depend on many factors including genotype, harvest period, climatic conditions and pH [33–36]. The higher anthocyanin levels of these two new cultivars indicates that they have the potential to be commercially important.
In this study, hybrids No. 4 line 26 and No. 4 line 5 showed a lower hue angle and L* in both peel and flesh than occurred in either the parents or inAkihime. Consequently, fruit color was a deeperred. Previous findings have shown that differences in L* and hue angle depend on cultivar, year and harvest period [37]. In another study, Camarosa showed lower hue angle and L* in both years that were investigated, consistent with a redder and darker color. Total anthocyanin content among six genotypes was in the decreasing order: Ovation <Puget Reliance < 2384-1 < 2273-1 < Totem <1723-2 [38]. The selection 1723-2 had the highest anthocyanin content and the lowest L* and h° values while Ovation had the lowest anthocyanin content and the highest L* and h° values. Moreover, hue angle and anthocyanin content were correlated and could be used as a screening tool for total anthocyanin content [17]. Our study provided a similar relationship, where hue angle in both peel and flesh of the two hybrid lines were the lowest and anthocyanin content was the highest in the fruit tested (Tables 2 and 6).However, pH is one factor which may impact on these results. Anthocyanins have been shown to be more stable at low pH (acidic conditions), which results in a dark red pigment, primarily as cyanidin [39]. Athigher pH (alkalinity condition) anthocyanin provides colors such as bright red pigment, primarily as pelargonidin. These colors also depend on a direct relationship with the number of hydroxyl groups and an indirect relationship with the number of methoxyl groups. This corresponds with our results, which show that hybrid No. 4 line 26 has a low pH, corresponding with the highest cyanidin-3-glucoside concentration. The hybrid No. 4 line 5 had a higher pH than either of the parents or of Akihime, and the Pg-3-glc contentwas also the highest.
Table 6
Peel and flesh color of parental and of two lines of strawberry cultivars
| Parental/Hybrid pairs | Line | Peel color | Flesh color | ||||||
| L* | a* | b* | Hue angle | L* | a* | b* | Hue angle | ||
| Praratchatan No. 50 | – | 31.93±0.28bc1/ | 38.80±0.21bc1/ | 18.92±0.19c1/ | 26.20±0.20b1/ | 56.60±0.29bc1/ | 30.33±0.15d1/ | 25.13±0.17ab1/ | 39.00±0.05b1/ |
| Praratchatan No. 72 | – | 35.57±0.08ab | 38.13±0.02c | 29.39±0.28a | 35.30±0.23a | 57.93±0.21b | 36.22±0.10c | 25.90±0.25a | 36.03±0.16bc |
| Akihime | – | 39.20±0.19a | 36.93±0.20c | 24.92±0.11b | 33.60±0.26a | 72.20±0.02a | 6.95±0.13e | 10.83±0.15d | 58.57±0.18a |
| Praratchatan No. 50× | 5 | 31.68±0.03bc | 40.70±0.12b | 15.92±0.23d | 22.73±0.16c | 50.71±0.15c | 41.48±0.24b | 24.23±0.06bc | 35.47±0.04bc |
| Praratchatan No. 72 | |||||||||
| Praratchatan No. 50× | 26 | 31.44±0.16c | 43.69±0.03a | 13.52±0.25e | 21.67±0.18c | 50.27±0.11c | 51.63±0.07a | 23.12±0.10c | 33.80±0.08c |
| Praratchatan No. 72 | |||||||||
1/Means values (±SD); n = 10; with the different superscripted in lowercase letter within the same column are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Therefore, the elevated levels of anthocyanin content obtained in both hybrids have a potential significance for human health benefits. The anthocyanin increase was related to the genetic background of the selected parents used in the cross combinations, which were chosen because they had already been identified as having high anthocyanin content in comparison with other cultivars [1]. The results show that Praratchatan No. 50 and Praratchatan No. 72, which were the parents of these hybrid strawberry lines, produced higher anthocyanin content in the progeny compared with the other parent tested.
For bioactive compound analysis, as measured by antioxidant activity (Table 3), hybrid No. 4 line 5 had the highest total phenolic and FRAP concentrations (2579.12 mg GAE/kgFW and 30.24 mmol Fe2 +/kgFW, respectively). These results are similar to the total phenolics and FRAP values of 2525 mg GAE/kg FW and 27.9 mmol Fe2 + /kg FW of the new breeding line BL 2006-221-8 [17] and similar to those from three cultivars from selections of Fragaria×ananassa and one cultivar (F1) selection from an inter-specific cross F.×ananassa×F.virginiana spp. glauca (1800–3200 mg GAE/kg FW) [40]. Similarly, 20 selections derived from a strawberry interspecific backcross breeding program had approximately 1381–2992 mg GAE/kg FW of total phenolics [41]. Our two new hybrid cultivars are within those reported ranges (2295–2579 mg GAE/kgFW). Total phenolic compounds of these two new strawberry cultivars (Table 3) were clearly higher than that in three cultivars from back-crossing of BC1-FVG×F.×ananassa (1964.33 mg GAE/kg FW) derived from 8 families. Two cultivars that originated from F.×ananassa intra-species crossinghad the lowest value of total phenolics (1363.16 mg GAE/kg FW) [1]. FRAP values of hybrid lines 5 and 26 (Table 3) were almost twice as highthanin six other hybrid pairs of strawberry [40]. However, antioxidant activity is not only determined by FRAP but also by other metabolites. Therefore, the measurement of other antioxidant activity by methods including DPPH, ABTS and ORAC would be useful for compiling antioxidant information about the two new strawberry hybrids in this study and of hybrids in other studies. In this study, the physico-chemical characteristics of the hybrid strawberries were significantly better than those of their parents or of Akihime, especially with regard to fruit width, length, fresh weight, firmness, TSS/TA and vitamin C concentration (Tables 4 and 5). The highest TSS/TA ratio of the two newhybrid strawberry cultivars would indicate more sweetness and less sourness, which would possibly improve berry flavor. The balance between TSS and acidity (ratio) is an indicator of consumer acceptance [42]. Hence, specific sugar-acid ratios are used as maturity and quality standards in marketing, especially in international trade [43].
5Conclusions
The results obtained in this work show that the inclusion of parent strawberry cultivars such as Praratchatan No. 50 and Praratchatan No. 72 can be useful in improving the nutritional quality of fruit. However, the two new hybrid strawberry lines, specifically hybrids No. 4 line 5 and No. 4 line 26 have a promising basis for producing strawberries with higher levels of bioactive compounds and improved morphological characteristics, which would make them particularly attractive to consumers. Therefore, these two new cultivars have commercial potential in Thailand and in other regions of the world with similar growing conditions.
Funding
The authors report no funding.
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflict of interest to report.
Acknowledgments
We extend our thanks to The Thailand Research Fund (TRF) through the Research and Researchers Funds for Industries (RRi) in Ph.D. Program (Grant number PHD 57I0042), the Newton Fund PhD Placement for Scholars 2018/19 (Application ID: 420192291), the Royal Project Foundation, Chiang Mai, for the financial support, the Center of Excellence in Postharvest Technology, Naresuan University and the Postharvest Technology Innovation Center, Chiang Mai University under the Thai Commission of Higher Education for the use of scientific instruments. Thanks to Prof. Ian Warrington and Prof. Bruno Mezzetti for assistance in editing and proofing this manuscript.
References
[1] | Diamanti J , Capocasa F , Balducci F , Battino M , Hancock J , Mezzetti B . Increasing strawberry fruit sensorial and nutritional quality using wild and cultivated germplasm. Plos One. (2012) ;7: :1–16. |
[2] | Biswas MK , Islam R , Hossain M . Somatic embryogenesis in strawberry (Fragaria sp.) through callus culture. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. (2007) ;90: (1):49–54. |
[3] | Dai J , Patel JD , Mumper RJ . Characterization of blackberry extract and its antiproliferative and anti-inflammatory properties. J Med Food. (2007) ;10: (2):258–65. |
[4] | Hartman RE , Shah A , Fagan AM , Schwetye KE , Parsadanian M , Schulman RN , Finn MB , Holtzman DM . Pomegranate juice decreases amyloid load and improves behavior in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Dis. (2006) ;24: (3):506–515. |
[5] | Jayaprakasam B , Vareed SK , Olson LK , Nair MG . Insulin secretion by bioactive anthocyanins and anthocyanidins present in fruits. J Agric Food Chem. (2005) ;53: (1):28–31. |
[6] | Jayaprakasam B , Olson LK , Schutzki RE , Tai MH , Nair MG . Amelioration of obesity and glucose intolerance in high-fat-fed C57BL/6 mice by anthocyanins and ursolic acid in Cornelian cherry (Cornus mas). J Agric Food Chem. (2006) ;54: (1):243–48. |
[7] | West T , Atzeva M , Holtzman DM . Pomegranate polyphenols and resveratrol protect the neonatal brain against hypoxic-ischemic injury. Dev Neurosci. (2007) ;29: (4-5):363–72. |
[8] | Hou DX . Potential mechanisms of cancer chemoprevention by anthocyanins. Curr Mol Med. (2003) ;3: (2):149–59. |
[9] | Rice-Evans CA , Miller NJ , Bolwell PG , Bramley PM , Pridham JB . Therelative antioxidant activities of plant-derived polyphenolic flavonoids. Free Radic Res. (1995) ;22: (4):375–383. |
[10] | Xia M , Ling W , Zhu H , Wang Q , Ma J , Hou M , Tang Z , Li L , Ye Q . Anthocyanin preventsCD40-activated proinflammatorysignaling in endothelial cells by regulating cholesterol distribution. ArteriosclerThrombVasc Biol. (2007) ;27: (3):519–524. |
[11] | Hope Smith S , Tate PL , Huang G , Magee JB , Meepagala KM , Wedge DE , Larcom LL . Antimutagenic activity of berry extracts. J Med Food. (2004) ;7: (4):450–55. |
[12] | Wang CJ , Wang JM , Lin WL , Chu CY , Chou FP , Tseng TH . Protective effect of hibiscus anthocyaninsagainst tert-butyl hydroperoxide induced hepatic toxicity in rats. Food Chem Toxicol. (2000) ;38: (5):411–16. |
[13] | Joseph JA , Denisova NA , Arendash G , Gordon M , Diamond D , Shukitt-Hale B , Morgan D . Blueberry supplementation enhances signaling and prevents behavioral deficits in an Alzheimer disease model. NutrNeurosci. (2003) ;6: (3):153–62. |
[14] | Giampieri F , Tulipani S , Alvarez-Suarez JM , Quiles JL , Mezzetti B , Battino M . The strawberry: Composition, nutritional quality, and impact on human health. Nutrition. (2012) ;28: (1):9–19. |
[15] | Goiffon JP , Mouly PP , Gaydou EM . Anthocyanic pigment determination inred fruit juices, concentrated juices and syrups using liquid chromatography. Anal Chim Acta. (1999) ;382: (1-2):39–50. |
[16] | Duarte LJ , Chaves VC , Nascimento MVPDS , Calvete E , Li M , Ciraolo E , Ghigo A , Hirsch E , Simões CMO , Reginatto FH , Dalmarco EM . Molecular mechanismof action of Pelargonidin-3-O-glucoside, the main anthocyanin responsible for the anti-inflammatory effect of strawberry fruits. Food Chem. (2018) ;247: :56–65. |
[17] | Fredericks CH , Fanning KJ , Gidley MJ , Netzel G , Zabaras D , Herrington M , Netzel M . High-anthocyanin strawberries through cultivar selection. J Sci Food Agric. (2013) ;93: (4):846–52. |
[18] | Pipattanawong N , Thongyeun B , Tacha W , Tiwong S , Akagi H . Strawberry cultivar Praratchatan No. 80. Agriculture news. (2011) ;56: :22–28. |
[19] | Sirijan M , Chaiprasart P . Generation of strawberry hybrid population for enhancing potential of anthocyanin content, Proceeding Thailand Research Symposium National Research Council of Thailand. 2017;580-90. |
[20] | Darrow GM . The strawberry: History, Breeding and Physiology. Holt, Rinehart and Winston: New York; (1966) . |
[21] | Kim SK , Bae RN , Na H , Ko KD , Chun C . Changes in physicochemical characteristics during fruit development in june-bearing strawberry cultivars. Hortic Environ Biotechnol. (2013) ;54: (1):44–51. |
[22] | Palapol Y , Ketsa S , Stevenson D , Cooney JM , Allan AC , Ferguson IB . Colour development and quality of mangosteen (Garcinia mangostana L.) fruitduring ripening and after harvest. Postharvest Biol. Technol. (2009) ;51: (3):349–53. |
[23] | Singleton VL , Rossi JA . Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid reagents. Am J Enol Vitic. (1965) ;16: :144–58. |
[24] | Netzel M , Netzel G , Tian Q , Schwartz S , Konczak I . Native Australian fruits: A novel source of antioxidants for food. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. (2007) ;8: (3):339–46. |
[25] | Benzie IFF , Strain JJ . The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of ‘antioxidant power’: the FRAP assay. Anal Biochem. (1996) ;239: (1):70–76. |
[26] | Diamanti J , Balducci F , Vittori LD , Capocasa F , Berdini C , Bacchi A , Giampieri F , Battino M , Mezzetti B . Physico-chemical characteristics ofthermallyprocessed pure’e fromdifferent strawberry genotypes. J Food Compost Anal. (2015) ;43: :106–118. |
[27] | Tulipani S , Mezzetti B , Capocasa F , Bompadre S , Beekwilder J , Ric De Vos CH , Capanoglu E , Bovy A , Battino M . Antioxidants, phenolic compounds and nutritional quality of differentstrawberry genotypes. J Agric Food Chem. (2008) ;56: (3):696–704. |
[28] | Capocasa F , Diamanti J , Tulipani S , Battino M , Mezzetti B . Breeding strawberry (Fragaria×ananassa Duch) to increase fruit nutritional quality. BioFactors. (2008) ;34: (1):67–72. |
[29] | Aaby K , Mazur S , Nes A , Skrede G . Phenolic compounds in strawberry (Fragaria×ananassa Duch.) fruits: Composition in 27 cultivars and changes during ripening. Food Chem. (2012) ;132: (1):86–97. |
[30] | Yu C , Ranieri M , Lv D , Zhang M , Charles MT , Tsao R , Rekika D , Khanizadeh S . Phenolic composition and antioxidant capacity of newly developed strawberry lines from British Columbia and Quebec. Int J Food Prop. (2011) ;14: (1):59–67. |
[31] | Kelebek H , Selli S . Characterization of phenolic compounds in strawberry fruitsby RP-HPLC-DAD and investigation of their antioxidant capacity. J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol. (2011) ;34: (20):1–10. |
[32] | Lopes-da-Silva F , Escribano-Bailòn MT , Pérez Alonso JJ , Rivas-Gonzalo JC , Santos-Buelga C . Anthocyanin pigments in strawberry. LWT. (2007) ;40: (2):374–82. |
[33] | Bakowska A , Kucharska AZ , Oszmiański J . The effects of heating, UVirradiation, and storage on stability of the anthocyanin-polyphenol copigment complex. Food Chem. (2003) ;81: (3):349–55. |
[34] | Stapleton SC , Chandler CK , Legard DE , Price JF , Sumler JC Jr. . Transplant source affectsfruiting performance and pests of ‘sweet Charlie’ strawberry in Florida. Hort Technology. (2001) ;11: (1):61–65. |
[35] | Crecente-Campo J , Nunes-Damaceno M , Romero-Rodríguez MA , Vázquez-Odériz ML . Color, anthocyanin pigment, ascorbic acid and total phenolic compound determination in organic versus conventional strawberries (Fragaria×ananassa Duch, cv Selva). J Food Compost Anal. (2012) ;28: (1):23–30. |
[36] | Ornelas-Paz Jde J , Yahia EM , Ramírez-Bustamante N , Pérez-Martínez JD , Escalante-Minakata Mdel P , Ibarra-Junquera V , Acosta-Muñiz C , Guerrero-Prieto V , Ochoa-Reyes E . Physical attributes and chemical composition of organic strawberry fruit (Fragaria×ananassa Duch, Cv. Albion) at six stages of ripening. Food Chem. (2013) ;138: (1):372–381. |
[37] | Voća S , Žlabur JS , Dobričević N , Jakobek L , Šeruga M , Galić A , Pliestić S . Variation in the bioactive compound content at three ripening stages of strawberry fruit. Molecules. (1038) ;19: (7):0–5. |
[38] | Ngo T , Wrolstad RE , Zhao Y . Color quality of Oregon strawberries-Impact of genotype, composition, and processing. J Food Sci. (2007) ;72: (1):C025–C032. |
[39] | Wahyuningsih S , Wulandari L , Wartono MW , Munawaroh H , Ramelan AH . The effect of pH and color stability of anthocyanin on food colorant. IopConf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. (2016) ;193: (1):1–9. |
[40] | Capocasa F , Scalzo J , Mezzetti B , Battino M . Combining quality and antioxidant attributes in the strawberry: The role of genotype. Food Chem. (2008) ;111: (4):872–78. |
[41] | Diamanti J , Mazzoni L , Balducci F , Cappelletti R , Capocasa F , Battino M , Dobson G , Stewart D , Mezzetti B . Use of wild genotypes in breeding programincreases strawberry fruit sensorial and nutritional quality. J Agric Food Chem. (2014) ;62: (18):3944–3953. |
[42] | Mahmood T , Anwar F , Abbas M , Boyee MC , Saari N . Compositional variation in sugars and organic acids at different stages in selected small fruits from Pakistan. Int J Mol Sci. (2012) ;13: (2):1380–1392. |
[43] | Usenik V , Fabcic J , Stampar F . Sugars, organic acids, phenolic compositionand antioxidant activity of sweet cherry. Food Chem. (2008) ;107: (1):185–192. |
