Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Mattke, Soerena; * | Jun, Hankyungb | Chu, Samanthac | Hanson, Marka
Affiliations: [a] The USC Brain Health Observatory, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA | [b] Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA | [c] Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
Correspondence: [*] Correspondence to: Soeren Mattke, MD, DSc, The USC Brain Health Observatory, University of Southern California, 635 Downey Way, #505N, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA. Tel.: +1 202 468 5797; E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: Background:Individuals dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid (duals) may face greater obstacles to access to disease-modifying Alzheimer’s treatments in spite of their higher disease burden, because of clinicians’ reluctance to accept Medicaid and the so-called “lesser of” policy, under which Medicaid may pay providers lower rates. Objective:To project differential wait times for duals compared to Medicare-only beneficiaries by state. Methods:We used State Medicaid payment policy and Medicare enrollment data and a Markov model to predict differential wait times for duals and non-duals from 2023 to 2050. We estimated available diagnostic appointments by state for both groups based on reluctance of clinicians to accept Medicaid and the “lesser of” policy for each year. Results:We estimate overall average wait times of almost two years (22.9 months) but almost three times as long for duals (59.8 months) than non-duals (20.7 months) because of higher disease burden. The effects of Medicaid payment policy would increase average wait times for duals to 89 months with 20 states having wait times of 99 months or more, which would effectively deprive duals of access. Conclusions:The added average wait times in many states would effectively deprive duals from access to treatment and translate into avoidable disease progression and mortality. Policy interventions to reduce financial and nonfinancial obstacles are dearly needed to avoid deepening disparities. Examples are coverage arrangements that integrate Medicare and Medicaid coverage, covering the co-payment for physician services in full, and stricter network adequacy requirements for Medicaid Managed Care plans.
Keywords: Access to care, Alzheimer’s disease, diagnosis, disease-modifying treatment, disparities, dual eligibility, medicare, medicaid, payment policy, wait times
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-231134
Journal: Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 98, no. 4, pp. 1403-1414, 2024
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]