Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Systematic Review
Authors: Martin, Jissaa; * | Reid, Natashaa | Ward, David D.a | King, Shannonb | Hubbard, Ruth E.a; c | Gordon, Emily H.a; c
Affiliations: [a] Centre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia | [b] Busselton Hospital, WA Country Health Service, Western Australia, Australia | [c] Princess Alexandra Hospital, Metro South Hospital and Health Service, Queensland, Australia
Correspondence: [*] Correspondence to: Jissa Martin, Centre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. Tel.: +61 406520402; E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: Background:Developing effective strategies for reducing dementia risk requires a detailed understanding of the risk and protective factors associated with the progression of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to dementia. Objective:We aimed to systematically review the evidence for sex differences in these factors. Methods:Five online databases (PubMed/CINAHL/EMBASE/PsycINFO/Cochrane) were searched from inception until 17 October 2022 for cohort studies that focused on sex differences in risk and protective factors in the progression of MCI to dementia. Results:A total of 2,972 studies were identified, of which 12 studies from five countries were included in the systematic review. There was substantial variability in study designs, study populations and outcome measures. Sex differences were present in the associations of sociodemographic, health, psychological factors, genetic and other biomarkers with the progression of MCI to dementia. APOE ɛ4 status and depression appeared to increase the risk of progression for females, whereas history of stroke, MRI markers and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers appeared to increase the risk of progression for males. APOE ɛ2 status and marital status (unmarried) were observed to reduce risk of progression in males and females, respectively. Conclusions:The ability of studies to accurately detail risk factors for dementia are likely limited when solely controlling for the effects of sex. Although the heterogeneity and underpowered nature of the studies made it difficult to synthesize the findings for each risk factor, this study highlights the apparent need for further research examining risk factors for dementia in males and females with MCI separately.
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease, cognitive dysfunction, dementia, protective factors, risk factors, sex characteristics
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-230700
Journal: Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 101-119, 2024
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]