Protocol for a Mixed-Methods Process Evaluation of BetterBrains: A Person-Centered Online Intervention to Delay Cognitive Decline in Adults at Risk of Dementia

Article type: Research Article

Authors: Ayton, Darshini^a | Pirotta, Stephanie^a | Morello, Renata^a | Rosenich, Emily^b | Barton, Chris^c | Lavale, Alexandra^b | Pase, Matthew P.^b | Maruff, Paul^{d; e} | Yassi, Nawaf^{f; g} | Brodtmann, Amy^h | Lim, Yen Ying^b | Barker, Annaⁱ | on behalf of the BetterBrains Research Group

Affiliations: [a] Health and Social Care Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia | [b] Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia | [c] Department of General Practice, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia | [d] Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia | [e] Cogstate Ltd., Melbourne, VIC, Australia | [f] Department of Medicine and Neurology, Melbourne Brain Centre at The Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia | [g] Population Health and Immunity Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC, Australia | [h] Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, The Alfred Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia | [i] Silver Chain Group, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

Correspondence: [*] Correspondence to: Dr. Darshini Ayton, Health and Social Care Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Level 1, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne VIC 3004 Australia. E-mail: [email protected].

Abstract: Background:The BetterBrains Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) will evaluate the effectiveness of an online, person-centered, risk factor management, coaching intervention in community-dwelling, healthy adults at risk of cognitive decline. Multi-component interventions are challenging to evaluate due to program complexity and personalization to individual needs and contexts. This paper describes a multi-level process evaluation conducted alongside the BetterBrains RCT. Objective:To understand how and why the BetterBrains intervention was effective or ineffective at reducing cognitive decline in healthy adults whilst considering the context in which it was implemented. Methods:1,510 non cognitively-deteriorated community-dwelling adults aged 40–70 years old at risk of cognitive decline will be recruited and randomly assigned to the intervention or control group. All BetterBrains intervention participants, coaches, and the research team will be included in the evaluation. A mixed-methods design will be used, guided by The Framework for Implementation Fidelity and the program logic model. Data will be sourced from interviews, focus groups, surveys, BetterBrains coach notes, participant weekly check-in surveys, and audio recordings of intervention coaching sessions. Quantitative data will be analyzed via descriptive and inferential statistics and qualitative data will be analyzed using content and thematic analysis. Results:The process evaluation will provide information about contextual and influencing factors related to the implementation of BetterBrains and the RCT outcomes. Conclusion:Understanding how BetterBrains was implemented and its associated impacts will inform the translation of the program into community and clinical settings, providing easy access to online, personalized dementia prevention services.

Keywords: Chronic disease prevention, cognitive decline, implementation, process evaluation

DOI: 10.3233/JAD-220341

Journal: Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 1689-1703, 2022