Olfactory Phenotypes Differentiate Cognitively Unimpaired Seniors from Alzheimer’s Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Combined Machine Learning and Traditional Statistical Approach
Affiliations:
University of Kansas Medical Center, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Kansas City, KS, USA
Correspondence:
[*]
Correspondence to: Jennifer Villwock, MD, University of Kansas Medical Center, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Mailstop 3010, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA. Tel.: +1 913 588 6719; Fax: +1 913 588 4676; E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: Background:Olfactory dysfunction (OD) is an early symptom of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However, olfactory testing is not commonly performed to test OD in the setting of AD. Objective:This work investigates objective OD as a non-invasive biomarker for accurately classifying subjects as cognitively unimpaired (CU), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and AD. Methods:Patients with MCI (n = 24) and AD (n = 24), and CU (n = 33) controls completed two objective tests of olfaction (Affordable, Rapid, Olfactory Measurement Array –AROMA; Sniffin’ Sticks Screening 12 Test –SST12). Demographic and subjective sinonasal and olfaction symptom information was also obtained. Analyses utilized traditional statistics and machine learning to determine olfactory variables, and combinations of variables, of importance for differentiating normal and disease states. Results:Inability to correctly identify a scent after detection was a hallmark of MCI/AD. AROMA was superior to SST12 for differentiating MCI from AD. Performance on the clove scent was significantly different between all three groups. AROMA regression modeling yielded six scents with AUC of the ROC of 0.890 (p < 0.001). Random forest model machine learning algorithms considering AROMA olfactory data successfully predicted MCI versus AD disease state. Considering only AROMA data, machine learning algorithms were 87.5%accurate (95%CI 0.4735, 0.9968). Sensitivity and specificity were 100%and 75%, respectively with ROC of 0.875. When considering AROMA and subject demographic and subjective data, the AUC of the ROC increased to 0.9375. Conclusion:OD differentiates CUs from those with MCI and AD and can accurately predict MCI versus AD. Leveraging OD data may meaningfully guide management and research decisions.
