Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Ayton, Darshinia; * | Gardam, Madeleinea | Ward, Stephaniea; b | Brodaty, Henryb | Pritchard, Elizabetha | Earnest, Arula | Krysinska, Karolinaa | Banaszak-Holl, Janea | McNeil, Johna | Ahern, Susannaha
Affiliations: [a] Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia | [b] Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing (CHeBA), School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney, NSW, Australia
Correspondence: [*] Correspondence to: Dr. Darshini Ayton, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne 3004, Australia. Tel.: +61 3 9903 1660; E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: Background:A clinical quality registry (CQR) for dementia provides benefits to those living with dementia and their carers by improving the quality and experience of care through benchmarking and monitoring patient outcomes. CQRs use data collected to form clinical quality indicators (CQIs) through which variations in clinical processes and outcomes between different services and jurisdictions can be highlighted. Objective:This modified Delphi study aimed to develop CQIs for a pilot Australian CQR for dementia and mild cognitive impairment. These CQIs are based on evidence, patient and caregiver experience, and clinician perspectives across the trajectory of care from diagnosis to end-of-life. Methods:An initial list of indicators from existing dementia registries, academic literature, and clinical practice guidelines was synthesized. A working group of clinicians and registry experts further refined these indicators. A panel of experts comprised of a consumer, a carer, clinicians, consumer organization representatives, and academics. The experts participated in three phases of the modified Delphi study: 1) online survey for scoring importance and validity, 2) a one-day face-to-face discussion, and 3) final survey round to assess importance, validity, and feasibility. Results:The panel assessed 33 CQIs and confirmed a final set of 18 indicators. The CQIs mapped to the domains of quality of diagnosis, quality of management, access to services and supports, and potentially preventable complications. These CQIs will be tested initially in memory clinics and inform the data collection processes for the Australia Dementia Network Registry (ADNet). Conclusion:A dementia CQR is fundamental to ongoing monitoring and development of good quality and consistent care across Australia.
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease, clinical quality registry, dementia, modified Delphi study
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-191044
Journal: Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 923-936, 2020
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]