Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Capp, Kimberly E.a | Curiel Cid, Rosie E.b | Crocco, Elizabeth A.b | Stripling, Ashleya | Kitaigorodsky, Marcelab | Sierra, Luis A.b | Melo, Jose G.b | Loewenstein, David A.b; *
Affiliations: [a] Nova Southeastern University, Davie, FL, USA | [b] Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Center for Cognitive Neuroscience and Aging, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
Correspondence: [*] Correspondence to: David A. Loewenstein, PhD, ABPP/CN, Professor of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1695 NW 9th Avenue, Suite 3202, Miami, FL 33136, USA. Tel.: +1 305 355-9080; E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: Background:Semantic intrusion errors on memory tests may represent very early cognitive changes associated with elevated Alzheimer’s disease pathology within the brain, including amyloid-β (Aβ). Subscales that measure proactive semantic interference (PSI) and intrusions related to PSI on the Loewenstein Acevedo Scales of Semantic Interference and Learning (LASSI-L) have been associated with high levels of brain amyloid load, structural changes on brain MRI in Hispanic and non-Hispanic groups. It is presently unknown whether intrusion errors or other measures of the LASSI-L can differentiate between African-American (AA) older adults diagnosed with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) or classified as cognitively normal (CN). Objective:This study examined the extent to which a high percentage of semantic intrusion errors on LASSI-L subscales susceptible to PSI and other LASSI-L measures could differentiate between AA aMCI and CN groups. Methods:Forty-eight AA older adults were recruited (27 CN and 21 aMCI) and received a through clinical and neuropsychological evaluation. The LASSI-L was administered independent of diagnostic classification. Results:With and without statistical adjustment for literacy, AA aMCI participants scored lower on all LASSI-L measures. ROC analyses revealed an area under the curve exceeding 90% and correctly classified 86% of AA aMCI with 82% specificity for AA CN participants. Conclusions:Percentage of intrusion errors on the LASSI-L subscales susceptible to PSI differentiated AA aMCI from AA CN. This adds to emerging evidence indicating that the LASSI-L may be culturally appropriate and can differentiate between aMCI and CN in diverse ethnic/cultural groups.
Keywords: African Americans, Alzheimer’s disease, amyloid, cognitive assessment, diversity, intrusions, memory, mild cognitive impairment, neuropsychological tests, semantic interference
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-191022
Journal: Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 785-790, 2020
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]