Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Coebergh, Jan A.F.a; b; c; * | McDowell, Stevena | van Woerkom, Theodorus C.A.M.a | Koopman, Jan P.e | Mulder, Jacquelined | Bruijn, Sebastiaan F.T.M.a
Affiliations: [a] Department of Neurology, HagaHospital, The Hague, The Netherlands | [b] Department of Neurology, Ashford and St. Peter’s Hospital, Chertsey, United Kingdom | [c] Department of Neurology, St. George’s Hospital, Tooting, United Kingdom | [d] Department of Neuropsychology, HagaHospital, The Hague, The Netherlands | [e] Department of Ear, Nose and Throat Surgery, HagaHospital, The Hague, The Netherlands
Correspondence: [*] Correspondence to: Jan Adriaan Coebergh, MBBS FRCP, Department of Neurology, Ashford and St. Peter’s Hospital, Chertsey and St. George’s Hospital, Tooting, United Kingdom and Department of Neurology HagaHospital, Guildford Road, KT17 0PZ Chertsey, United Kingdom. E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: Auditory agnosia for environmental sounds (AES) is an example of central auditory dysfunction. It is presumed to be independent of language deficits and in presence of normal hearing. We undertook a detailed neuropsychological assessment including environmental sound naming and recognition in 34 clinically mild Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients and 29 age-matched healthy control subjects. In patients with AD, audiometry was performed to assess the impact on test performance, and in normal controls the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly – Screening Version to exclude more than mild hearing loss. We adapted a validated environmental sound battery and found near perfect scores in controls. We found that environmental sound agnosia is common in mild AD. We found a statistically significant difference in mean pure tone audiometry in the best ear between patients with and those patients without naming deficits of 11.3 dB (p = 0.010) and of 14.7 dB (p = 0.000) between those with and without recognition deficits. Statistical significance remained after correcting for age, aphasia, Mini-Mental State Examination score, and working memory. Slight and moderate peripheral hearing loss increases the odds ratio of recognition deficits by 13.75 (confidence interval 2.3–81.5) compared to normal hearing patients. We did not find evidence for different forms of AES. This work suggests that an interaction between peripheral hearing loss and AD pathology produces problems with environmental sound recognition. It confirms that the relationship between hearing and dementia is complex but also suggests that interventions to prevent and treat hearing loss could have an effect on AD in its clinical expression.
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease, central auditory dysfunction, environmental sound agnosia, hearing loss
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-190431
Journal: Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 73, no. 4, pp. 1407-1419, 2020
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]