Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Lee, Eunjunga; * | Gatz, Margaretb | Tseng, Chiuchena | Schneider, Lon S.c; d; e | Pawluczyk, Soniae | Wu, Anna H.a | Deapen, Dennisa
Affiliations: [a] Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA | [b] USC Dornsife Center for Economic and Social Research, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA | [c] USC Davis School of Gerontology, Los Angeles, CA, USA | [d] Department of Neurology, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA | [e] Department of Psychiatry and the Behavioral Sciences, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Correspondence: [*] Correspondence to: Eunjung Lee, Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Room 4449A, 1441 Eastlake Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA. Tel.: +1 323 865 0827; Fax: +1 323 865 0827; E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: Background:Medicare claims record linkage has been used to identify diagnosed dementia cases in order to estimate dementia prevalence and cost of care. Claims records in the 1990 s and early 2000 s have been found to provide 85% – ∼90% sensitivity and specificity. Objective:Considering that dementia awareness has improved over time, we sought to examine sensitivity and specificity of more recent Medicare claims records against a standard criterion, clinical diagnosis of dementia. Methods:For a sample of patients evaluated at the University of Southern California Alzheimer Disease Research Center (ADRC), we performed database linkage with Medicare claims files for a six-year period, 2007–2012. We used clinical diagnosis at the ADRC as the criterion diagnosis in order to calculate sensitivity and specificity. Results:Medicare claims correctly identified 85% of dementia patients and 77% of individuals with normal cognition. About half of patients clinically diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment had dementia diagnoses in Medicare claims. Misclassified dementia patients (i.e., missed diagnosis by Medicare claims) had more favorable Mini-Mental State Examination and Clinical Dementia Rating scores and were less likely to present behavioral symptoms than correctly-classified dementia patients. Conclusions:Database linkage to Medicare claims records is an efficient and reasonably accurate tool to identify dementia cases in a population-based cohort. However, possibilities of obtaining biased results due to misclassification of dementia status need to be carefully considered to use Medicare claims diagnosis for etiologic research studies. Additional confirmation of dementia diagnosis may also be considered. A larger study is warranted to confirm our findings.
Keywords: Data linkage, dementia, Medicare, sensitivity and specificity
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-181005
Journal: Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 769-778, 2019
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]