Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Ito, Kaoria; * | Corrigan, Briana | Romero, Klausb | Anziano, Richarda | Neville, Jonb | Stephenson, Dianeb | Lalonde, Richarda
Affiliations: [a] Pfizer Inc., Groton, CT, USA | [b] Critical Path Institute, Tucson, AZ, USA
Correspondence: [*] Correspondence to: Kaori Ito, Ph.D., Pfizer Inc., Pharmacometrics, 445 Eastern Point Road, Groton, CT 06340, USA. E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: Background:The placebo response and the underlying disease progression is difficult to differentiate in longitudinal Alzheimer’s disease (AD) studies, yet it is crucial to understand for designing clinical trials and interpreting results. Objectives:The placebo response in ADAS-cog11 from various studies was evaluated against model predictions derived from historical placebo data to demonstrate potential interpretation of study results using a prior understanding of expected disease progression. Methods:The placebo response component from a previously published disease progression model was used to estimate the longitudinal placebo response, and the disease progression in the placebo group in various case studies were evaluated. In addition, placebo data from the Coalition Against Major Diseases (CAMD) database in mild to moderate AD patients is described. Results:The case studies demonstrated potential different results in disease progression in a placebo group, and the impact on understanding the magnitude of drug effect. Baseline cognitive function is an important covariate of disease progression, therefore, it is important to evaluate the baseline severity and predict disease progression accordingly when comparing trial results. Furthermore, study duration, sample size, and study design may affect the placebo response, all of which have the potential to confound understanding of study results. Conclusion:The recent failures in Phase III AD studies are not likely due to insufficient cognitive decline in the control groups. A meta-analytic approach using all available data provides a robust understanding of placebo effect, disease progression, and potential interpretation of treatment effects, and offers a useful tool to aid in both trial design and interpretation.
Keywords: ADAS-cog, Alzheimer's disease, Coalition Against Major Diseases (CAMD), disease progression, meta-analysis, placebo response
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-130575
Journal: Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 173-183, 2013
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]