Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Review Article
Authors: Kalbe, Elkea; b | Calabrese, Pasqualec | Fengler, Sophied | Kessler, Josefb
Affiliations: [a] Institute of Gerontology & Center for Neuropsychological Diagnostics and Intervention (CeNDI), University of Vechta, Vechta, Germany | [b] Department of Neurology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany | [c] Department of Psychology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland | [d] Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
Correspondence: [*] Correspondence to: Elke Kalbe, PhD, Institute of Gerontology & Center for Neuropsychological Diagnostics and Intervention (CeNDI), University of Vechta, Driverstr. 22, 49377 Vechta, Germany. Tel.: +49 4441 15204; Fax: +49 4441 15621; E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: Many cognitive screening instruments have been developed during the last decades to detect mild cognitive dysfunction and dementia, and there is an ongoing discussion as to which tool should be used in which setting and which challenges have to be considered. Among other aspects, dependence on age is a recognized problem in screening tools which still has not found its way into common scoring procedures. Another aspect which has been handled very heterogeneously is which domain is represented in which proportion in the total score. Furthermore, screening ethnic minority patients has been identified as an important but so far widely unresolved matter. In this review, four cognitive screening tools that all follow a common, stringent concept and pay regard to some critical aspects are described: the DemTect, a “generic” tool; the PANDA for Parkinson's disease patients; the EASY, a non-verbal, culture-fair screening test for patients with migration background; and the MUSIC for patients with multiple sclerosis. All of these screening instruments have an age-correction, provide a total score in which the different subtests are weighted according to their individual sensitivity and specificity, and include tasks that are specifically aligned to the cognitive profile of the target group, including the EASY with non-verbal, culture-fair tasks to overcome language and cultural barriers. The development, main characteristics, data, and limitations of these tools are presented and discussed against the background of the current landscape of cognitive screening tools.
Keywords: Alzheimer's disease, cognition, cultural diversity, dementia, early diagnosis, mild cognitive impairment, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-122128
Journal: Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 813-834, 2013
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]