You are viewing a javascript disabled version of the site. Please enable Javascript for this site to function properly.
Go to headerGo to navigationGo to searchGo to contentsGo to footer
In content section. Select this link to jump to navigation

Editorial

In this issue of the International Journal of Developmental Science (IJDS) we continue with a special section titled “Probabilistic Epigenesis: Its Past and Prospects for the Future”, edited by Jaan Valsiner and Herbert Scheithauer. The first edition of this special section has been published in 2013 (Vol. 7, Issue 2), including a target article by Vanessa Lux (2013) and commentaries by Robert Lickliter (2013), Gary Greenberg (2013), and Ehud Lamm (2013). We are pleased that Peter C.M. Molenaar (2015a) took up our invitation to contribute a target article titled “An Interpretation of Part of Gilbert Gottlieb’s Legacy: Developmental Systems Theory Contra Developmental Behavior Genetics” that we present in the current issue of the special section, accompanied by outstanding commentaries from renowned scholars/author groups, namely Alexander von Eye (2015), Richard M. Lerner, Milena Batanova, Andrea Vest Ettekal and Cristina Hunter (2015), and Lars. R. Bergman (2015). We are especially pleased that Peter C.M. Molenaar (2015b) – in addition to his target article – contributed an Author’s Response to the respective commentaries. All of the articles included in the special section are excellent contributions in order to achieve a better understanding of “Gilbert Gottlieb’s legacy”.

The second part of the present issue includes an article by Harrie Jonkman, Claire Aussems, Majone Steketee, Hans Boutellier, and Pim Cuijpers (2015) titled “Prevention of Problem Behaviours among Adolescents: The Impact of the Communities that Care Strategy in the Netherlands (2008– 2011)” accompanied by a guest editorial by Richard F. Catalano and Harrie Jonkman (2015) about the promise and caution of international translational research. Following a thoroughly review process we decided to publish the study particularly because the evaluation of the implementation of the Communities that Care strategy in communities in the Netherlands revealed – unexpectedly – “zero results”: “No impact of CTC could be detected on the development of a broader range of behaviours, or on the initiation of drinking and smoking” (p. 1). In our opinion, there is a lack of published (evaluation) studies with non-significant effects, leading to a knowledge bias – beside the fact that publication of replication studiesare – from a positivists’ perspective – a necessary feature of scientific knowledge. However, we are aware of the controversial discussion of positivists and hermeneuticists in the literature:

So, social scientists are torn between two forces. On the one hand, they may be swayed by the ideal of positivist science and the desire to attain similar prestige as that held by natural scientists. On the other, they may be swayed by the insights of hermeneuticists and repelled by the epistemic imperialism of positivists. Moreover, their research tends to suggest that invariable laws are almost impossible to come by in social science. The positivist ideal seems impractical.” (Tsang & Kwan, 1999, p. 761)

To our opinion we are all supposed to learn from our mistakes – and we can learn from (evaluation) studies with non-significant, so called “zero” results and from replication studies. Thus, we hope to contribute with the publication of the manuscript by Jonkman et al. to a growing body of necessary publications of “zero” results and replication studies.

Herbert Scheithauer

Editor-in-Chief

Reference

1 

Bergman LR2015Invited commentary: Developmental systems theory and the person-oriented approach. Commentary on: An interpretation of part of Gilbert Gottlieb’s legacy: Developmental systems theory contra developmental behor geneticsInternational Journal of Developmental Science91518

2 

Catalano RF, Jonkman H2015International translational research: Promise and cautionInternational Journal of Developmental Science93336

3 

Greenberg G2013A long way from genes to behavior. Commentary on: With Gottlieb beyond Gottlieb: The role of epigenetics in psychobiological developmentInternational Journal of Developmental Science98386

4 

Jonkman H, Aussems C, Steketee M, Boutellier H, Cuijpers P2015Prevention of problem behours among adolescents: The impact of the communities that care strategy in the Netherlands (2008–2011)International Journal of Developmental Science93752

5 

Lamm E2013Epigenetic mechanisms underlie genome development. Commentary on: With Gottlieb beyond Gottlieb: The role of epigenetics in psychobiological development International Journal of Developmental Science78791

6 

Lerner RM, Batanova M, Vest Ettekal A, Hunter C2015Invited commentary: When the stars align: On the contributions of Gilbert Gottlieb and Peter C.M. Molenaar to developmental science theory and method. Commentary on: An interpretation of part of Gilbert Gottlieb’s legacy: Developmental systems theory contra developmental behor geneticsInternational Journal of Developmental Science91114

7 

Lickliter R2013Modeling psychobiological development in the post-genomic era. Commentary on: With Gottlieb beyond Gottlieb: The role of epigenetics in psychobiological developmentInternational Journal of Developmental Science77982

8 

Lux V2013With Gottlieb beyond Gottlieb: The role of epigenetics in psychobiological developmentInternational Journal of Developmental Science76978

9 

Molenaar PCM2015aTarget article: An interpretation of part of Gilbert Gottlieb’s legacy: Developmental systems theory contra developmental behor geneticsInternational Journal of Developmental Science9510

10 

Molenaar PCM2015bTo commentaries on: An interpretation of part of Gilbert Gottlieb’s legacy: Developmental systems theory contra developmental behor geneticsInternational Journal of Developmental Science92329

11 

Tsang EWK, Kwan K-M1999Replication and theory development in organizational science: A critical realist perspectiveThe Academy of Management Review24759780

12 

von Eye A2015Invited commentary: Who are we talking about? A discussion of Peter Molenaar’s interpretation of Gottlieb’s legacy. Commentary on: An interpretation of part of Gilbert Gottlieb’s legacy: Developmental systems theory contra developmental behor geneticsInternational Journal of Developmental Science91922