Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Bernasconi, Elenaa | Filippi, Francoa | Lazzerini, Beatriceb; * | Niccolini, Benedettab | Petronella, Gianlucaa
Affiliations: [a] Alenia Aermacchi SpA, Venegono Superiore (VA), Italy | [b] Dipartimento di Ingegneria dell'Informazione: Elettronica, Informatica, Telecomunicazioni, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Beatrice Lazzerini, Dipartimento di Ingegneria dell'Informazione: Elettronica, Informatica, Telecomunicazioni, University of Pisa, Largo Lucio Lazzarino 1, 56122 Pisa, Italy. E-mail: [email protected]
Abstract: In this paper we present a methodology for risk identification and evaluation in production processes. Our goal is twofold: on the one hand, we aim to allow risk analysis in a context that is clearly and formally described so as to help identify risks in a structured manner, on the other hand, we want to provide better tolerance and control of the ambiguity and vagueness that are often involved in subjective risk evaluation. To meet the first goal we adopt two different standard graphic notations, namely, the Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) and the Fuzzy Cognitive Maps (FCMs), to represent, respectively, the production process flow, and the cause-effect relationships between risks and their causes. In particular, this allows us to represent the whole set of risks related to a given production process as a graph whose nodes identify risks/causes and directed edges stand for a cause-effect relation between a risk and one of its causes. This graph helps the risk analyst better understand how risks can influence each other and, consequently, make more effective decisions. Finally, we explicitly associate each risk with the part/activity of the production process in which that risk might be generated, thus making risk management easier. To meet the second goal we resort to fuzzy systems. Particularly, we make use of two fuzzy systems: the first fuzzy system computes the risk impact as a function of time impact, cost impact and performance impact; the second fuzzy system infers the risk priority index from risk impact and risk probability. The application of the proposed methodology to an example of production process is also shown and discussed.
Keywords: Business process modeling, fuzzy cognitive maps, fuzzy systems, production processes, risk analysis
DOI: 10.3233/IDT-130155
Journal: Intelligent Decision Technologies, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 113-122, 2013
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]