Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Fan, Xinghuaa; * | Sun, Maosongb
Affiliations: [a] College of Computer Science and Technology, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Chongqing 400065, China. E-mails: [email protected]; [email protected] | [b] State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Technology and Systems, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author.
Abstract: The entity and relation recognition, i.e. (1) assigning semantic classes (e.g., person, organization and location) to entities in a sentence, and (2) determining the relations (e.g., born-in and employee-of) held between the corresponding entities, is an important task in areas such as information extraction and question answering. Subtasks (1) and (2) are typically carried out sequentially, and this procedure is problematic: errors made during subtask (1) are propagated to subtask (2) with an accumulative effect; and in many cases information that becomes available only during subtask (2) (e.g., the class of an entity corresponds to the first argument of relation born-in (X, China)) would be helpful for subtask (1) (e.g., the class of the entity cannot be a location but a person). To address problems of this kind, this paper develops a novel method, which allows subtasks (1) and (2) to be linked more closely together. The procedure is separated to three stages. Firstly, employ two classifiers to perform subtasks (1) and (2) independently. Secondly, the semantic class of each entity is determined by taking into account the classes of all the entities in the sentence, as computed during the previous step. This is achieved using a special model dubbed “entity relation propagation diagram” and “entity relation propagation tree”. Thirdly, each relation is then assigned a class by considering the semantic classes of the entities produced at the previous step. Our experimental results show that the method improves not only relation recognition but also entity recognition in some degree.
Keywords: Entity and relation recognition, knowledge representation, information extraction
DOI: 10.3233/IDA-2006-10106
Journal: Intelligent Data Analysis, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 81-102, 2006
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]