Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Issue title: Selected papers from the IEEE Conference on Information Reuse and Integration (IRI), July 13–15, 2008
Guest editors: S.H. Rubin and S.-C. Chen
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Lin, Ryan T.K.a | Chiu, Justin Liang-Tea; c | Dai, Hong-Jiea; d | Tsai, Richard Tzong-Hanb; * | Day, Min-Yuha | Hsu, Wen-Liana; d
Affiliations: [a] Institute of Information Science, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan | [b] Department of Computer Science & Engineering, Yuan Ze University, Taoyuan, Taiwan | [c] Department of Computer Science & Information Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan | [d] Department of Computer Science, National Tsing-Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Richard Tzong-Han Tsai, Department of Computer Science & Engineering, Yuan Ze University, Taoyuan, Taiwan. Tel.: +886 3 4638800 ext. 2367 ext. 7062; Fax: +886 3 4638850; E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: Biologists rely on keyword-based search engines to retrieve superficially relevant papers, from which they must filter out the irrelevant information manually. Question answering (QA) systems can offer more efficient and user-friendly ways of retrieving such information. Two contributions are provided in this paper. First, a factoid QA system is developed to employ a named entity recognition module to extract answer candidates and a linear model to rank them. The linear model uses various semantic features, such as named entity types and semantic roles. To tune the weights of features used by the model, a novel supervised learning algorithm, which only needs small amounts of training data, is provided. Second, a QA system may assign several answers with the same score, making evaluation unfair. To solve this problem, an efficient formula for a mean average reciprocal rank (MARR) is proposed to reduce the complexity of its computation. After employing all effective semantic features, our system achieves a top-1 MARR of 74.11% and top-5 MARR of 76.68%. In comparison of the baseline system, the top-1 and top-5 MARR increase by 9.5% and 7.1%. In addition, the experiment result on test set shows our ranking method, which achieves 55.58% top-1 MARR and 66.99% top-5 MARR, significantly surpasses traditional BM25 and simple voting in performance by averagely 35.23% and 36.64%, respectively.
DOI: 10.3233/ICA-2009-0316
Journal: Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 271-281, 2009
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]