You are viewing a javascript disabled version of the site. Please enable Javascript for this site to function properly.
Go to headerGo to navigationGo to searchGo to contentsGo to footer
In content section. Select this link to jump to navigation

Digital government and wicked problems: Solution or problem?

Abstract

The theme of the 16th International Conference on Digital Government Research (dg.o 2015) - ``Digital Government and Wicked Problems'' - drew attention to the increasingly complex global problems we are facing today. In the late 1960s, the term ``wicked problems'' was coined to refer to societal and public planning problems that had no definitive solutions [1,2]. Many problems, such as those identified in the theme of the conference - climate change, urbanization, and inequality - often exhibit the characteristics of ``wickedness'' in the sense that they are both difficult to define and solve. The selection of this theme for dg.o 2015 reflects the digital government research community's ambition and dedication to achieve a degree of understanding necessary to address some of the most intractable of these problems with the aid of emerging technologies. This special issue includes seven of the best papers from the dg.o 2015 conference.

In this editorial, we highlight the characteristics of ``wicked problems'' briefly, and the way in which the term is relevant in digital government research. We then introduce the articles selected for this special issue. Lastly, we provide suggestions to foster future research that addresses the nature of ``wickedness'' in digital government initiatives.

References

[1] 

Churchman CW. Guest editorial: Wicked problems. Management science. 1967; 14(4): B141-B142.

[2] 

Rittel HW, , Webber MM. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy sciences. 1973; 4(2): 155-69.

[3] 

Levin K, , Bernstein S, , Auld G, , Cashore B. Playing it forward: Path dependency, progressive incrementalism, and the `Super Wicked' problem of global climate change. 2009.

[4] 

Levin K, , Cashore B, , Bernstein S, , Auld G. Overcoming the tragedy of super wicked problems: constraining our future selves to ameliorate global climate change. Policy Sciences. 2012; 45(2): 123-52.

[5] 

Scholl HJ. E-government: Information, technology, and transformation: Routledge; 2015.

[6] 

Janowski T. Digital government evolution: From transformation to contextualization. Government Information Quarterly. 2015; 32(3): 221-36.

[7] 

Morgeson FV, , Mithas S. Does E-Government Measure Up to E-Business? Comparing End User Perceptions of US Federal Government and E-Business Web Sites. Public Administration Review. 2009; 69(4): 740-52.

[8] 

Bertot JC, , Jaeger PT, , Grimes JM. Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government information quarterly. 2010; 27(3): 264-71.

[9] 

Chatfield AT, , Reddick CG, , Brajawidagda U, editors. Tweeting propaganda, radicalization and recruitment: Islamic state supporters multi-sided twitter networks. Proceedings of the 16th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research; 2015: ACM.

[10] 

Hong S, , Kim SH. Political Polarization on Twitter: Implications for Citizen-Sourcing in Digital Governments. Government Information Quarterly. In-press.

[11] 

Kim Y, , Zhang J. Digital Government and Wicked Problems. Government Information Quarterly. In-press.

[12] 

Heeks R, , Bailur S. Analyzing e-government research: Perspectives, philosophies, theories, methods, and practice. Government information quarterly. 2007; 24(2): 243-65.

[13] 

Fountain JE. Building the virtual state: Information technology and institutional change: Brookings Institution Press; 2004.

[14] 

Cordella A, , Iannacci F. Information systems in the public sector: The e-Government enactment framework. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems. 2010; 19(1): 52-66.

[15] 

Tolbert CJ, , Mossberger K. The effects of e-government on trust and confidence in government. Public administration review. 2006; 66(3): 354-69.

[16] 

Carter L, , Bélanger F. The utilization of e-government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors. Information systems journal. 2005; 15(1): 5-25.

[17] 

Keohane RO, , Nye JS Jr.. Power and interdependence in the information age. Foreign affairs. 1998: 81-94.

[18] 

Zhang J, , Luna-Reyes LF, , Pardo TA, , Sayogo DS. Information, Models, and Sustainability: Policy Informatics in the Age of Big Data and Open Government: Springer; 2016.