Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Keen, Justina; * | Ruddle, Royb | Palczewski, Janc | Aivaliotis, Georgiosc | Palczewska, Annad | Megone, Christophere | Macnish, Kevinf
Affiliations: [a] Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, England | [b] School of Computing, University of Leeds, Leeds, England | [c] School of Mathematics, University of Leeds, Leeds, England | [d] School of Built Environment, Engineering and Computing, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, England | [e] School of Philosophy, University of Leeds, Leeds, England | [f] Centre for Ethics and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Justin Keen, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Level 10, Worsley Building, Clarendon Way, Leeds LS2 9JT, England. Tel.: +44 113 343 0831; E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: There is a widespread belief that machine learning tools can be used to improve decision-making in health and social care. At the same time, there are concerns that they pose threats to privacy and confidentiality. Policy makers therefore need to develop governance arrangements that balance benefits and risks associated with the new tools. This article traces the history of developments of information infrastructures for secondary uses of personal datasets, including routine reporting of activity and service planning, in health and social care. The developments provide broad context for a study of the governance implications of new tools for the analysis of health and social care datasets. We find that machine learning tools can increase the capacity to make inferences about the people represented in datasets, although the potential is limited by the poor quality of routine data, and the methods and results are difficult to explain to other stakeholders. We argue that current local governance arrangements are piecemeal, but at the same time reinforce centralisation of the capacity to make inferences about individuals and populations. They do not provide adequate oversight, or accountability to the patients and clients represented in datasets.
Keywords: Machine learning, governance, accountability, information infrastructure, health care, social care
DOI: 10.3233/IP-200264
Journal: Information Polity, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 57-69, 2021
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]