Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: McLoughlin, Liama | Ward, Stephena; * | Gibson, Rachelb | Southern, Rosalyndc
Affiliations: [a] School of Arts and Media, University of Salford, Salford, UK | [b] Cathie Marsh Institute for Social Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK | [c] Department of Communication and Media, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Stephen Ward, School of Arts and Media, Crescent House, University of Salford, Salford, M5 4WT, UK. Tel.: +44 161 295 2803; E-mail [email protected].
Note: [1] An early version of this paper entitled: ‘MPs, Twitter and the EU Referendum Campaign’ by the same authors was presented at the Elections, Parties and Opinion Polls (EPOP) Conference, University of Kent, 8–10th September 2016.
Abstract: This paper examines the structure of Twitter communication networks between MPs during the 2016 EU Referendum campaign. In particular, the research examines the impact of Twitter in two dimensions: (1) how far social media might facilitate inter-party linkages thus eroding traditional partisan relations between MPs? This was given added potential by the supposedly cross-party nature of the Referendum campaign and, therefore, we specifically examined the collective communicative networks that formed around Leave and Remain amongst MPs; (2) Given the potential of social media to provide a platform for individual politicians to personalize campaigns, we asked how far social media might disrupt traditional formal intra-party hierarchies? Did, for example, backbench or relatively unknown figures come to the fore in the EU debate? Our results indicate that whilst there existed a high degree of partisanship, interestingly, Remainer MPs tended to adhere to party networks resulting in a divided remain network. By contrast, the Leave network was more unified but also more porous. Within the networks themselves, the centrality of individual MPs did not always reflect their formal status.
Keywords: EU Referenda, MP networks, Twitter, inter-party, intra-party
DOI: 10.3233/IP-190140
Journal: Information Polity, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 49-66, 2020
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]