Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Jäske, Maijaa; * | Ertiö, Titianab
Affiliations: [a] Department of Philosophy, Contemporary History and Political Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland | [b] Department of Social Research, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Maija Jäske, Political Science, University of Turku, FI-20014 Turku, Finland. Tel.: +358 400 864830; E-mail [email protected]
Abstract: Recently, digital democratic applications have increased in presence and scope. This study clarifies how civic applications – bottom-up technologies that use open data to solve governance and policy challenges – can contribute to democratic governance. While civic applications claim to deepen democracy, systematic frameworks for assessing the democratic potential of civic apps are missing, because apps are often evaluated against technical criteria. This study introduces a framework for evaluating the democratic potential of civic apps, distinguishing six criteria: inclusiveness, deliberation, influence, publicity, mobilization, and knowledge production. The framework is applied to a case study of the Finnish DataDemo competition in 2014 by analyzing the institutional design features of six civic applications. It is argued that in terms of democratic governance, the greatest potential of civic apps lies in enhancing publicity and mobilization, while they should not be expected to increase inclusiveness or direct influence in decisions. Thus, our study contributes to understanding how civic applications can improve democracy in times of open data abundance.
Keywords: Democratic governance, democratic innovations, civic applications, open data contest, civic engagementKey points for practitioners:•Understanding the implications of democratic criteria, such as deliberation, inclusiveness, or policy influence helps practitioners align them with corresponding design features in civic app prototypes.•Civic apps do not necessarily improve democratic inclusiveness or influence in political decision-making processes due to open self-selection and bottom-up character.•Civic apps may contribute to deliberation in the public sphere, but their deliberative potential for participants remains limited unless they provide possibilities for moderated in-app dialogue amongst users.•Practitioners need to realize the potential of open data driven civic apps especially in fostering transparency and publicity of democratic governance, and mobilizing people into collective action.
DOI: 10.3233/IP-180105
Journal: Information Polity, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 21-39, 2019
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]