Affiliations: [a] Biomarkers Laboratory, Radiation Medicine Department, Atomic Energy Commission of Syria, Damascus, Syria | [b] Division of Thoracic Oncology, Oncology Department, Albairouni University Hospital, Damascus, Syria | [c] Radiobiology Laboratory, Biotechnology Department, Atomic Energy Commission of Syria, Damascus, Syria
Correspondence:
[*]
Corresponding author: Fadi Najjar, Biomarkers Laboratory, Department of Radiation Medicine, Atomic Energy Commission of Syria (AECS), 17 Nissan Street, P.O. Box 6091, Damascus 1000, Syria. Tel.: +96 311 213 2580; Fax: +96 311 611 2289; E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Circulating endothelial cells (CECs) and microparticles (MPs) are proposed as useful biosensors for angiogenesis and membrane damage in cancer. OBJECTIVE: We investigated their predictive value for progression disease (PD) and clinical outcomes in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy. METHODS: Peripheral blood samples were obtained from 60 patients. Immunomagnetic separation (IMS) and flow cytometry techniques were used to quantify CECs and MPs, respectively. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was used to determine the optimal cutoff values for CECs and MPs counts according to their levels in patients with an objective response (OR) and non-responders after treatment. Baseline serum biomarkers levels and their kinetics after chemotherapy were correlated with tumor response and outcomes in advanced NSCLC patients. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients presented an OR after chemotherapy. Of these, 28 patients progressed within three months. Through an increase in their levels during or after chemotherapy, CECs and MPs correctly predicted PD in 57% and 61% of these patients, respectively. Regarding tumor stage, NSCLC patients with stage IV had significantly higher pretreatment CECs and MPs levels than stage III patients (p= 0.037 and 0.018, respectively). Moreover, progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly longer in patients with high baseline CECs levels than those with low pretreatment CECs values (p= 0.05). Moreover, patients with high percentage change in CECs count after chemotherapy had significantly longer time to progression (TTP) duration (p= 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest the increase in CECs and MPs number during or after chemotherapy as predictive biomarkers of tumor progression in advanced NSCLC patients. An association of basal CECs and MPs values with tumor stage was also shown in advanced NSCLC patients. However, baseline CECs levels and their kinetics after chemotherapy seem to be prognostic factors in advanced NSCLC.
