Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Najm, Husam; | Nassif, Hani | Capers, Harry
Affiliations: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 623 Bowser Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA | Manager, Structural Engineering, State Bridge Engineer, New Jersey Department of Transportation, P.O. Box 600, Trenton, NJ 08625 – 0600, USA
Note: [] Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Abstract: This paper evaluates the impact of newly recommended LRFD seismic design guidelines (NCHRP Project 12-49) on the seismic design of bridges on soft soils in New Jersey. Current LRFD provisions are mostly based on the Division I-A Seismic Design of the AASHTO Standard Specifications (1996). NCHRP Project 12-49 was initiated to address the inadequate performance of highway bridges in recent earthquakes and the deficiencies in the current seismic code and to develop comprehensive specifications for seismic design of bridges considering all aspects of the design process. The intent of the new specifications is to be nationally applicable with provisions for all seismic zones. Because of the several significant changes in the design criteria and approach provided in the new provisions, there are questions on how these new provisions will affect the design and performance of bridge in states in the eastern United States as well as the retrofit of existing bridges. There are also questions about the impact of new provisions on the design of abutments and retaining walls. Hence, there was a need to evaluate the impact of the new seismic design provisions proposed in NCHRP 12-49 on the seismic design and detailing of bridges in New Jersey and the eastern United States. Two examples were designed based on NCHRP 12-49 recommended guidelines and the current LRFD specifications showed that the soil site factors had a major effect on the design. Also the transverse reinforcement requirements in plastic hinge zones were higher in the new NCHRP 12-49 provisions for larger diameter columns with heavy reinforcement than those in the current AASHTO LRFD.
Keywords: NCHRP 12-49, Seismic design, Return period, Plastic hinges, Response spectra
DOI: 10.1080/1573248042000274542
Journal: Bridge Structures, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 29-42, 2005
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]