You are viewing a javascript disabled version of the site. Please enable Javascript for this site to function properly.
Go to headerGo to navigationGo to searchGo to contentsGo to footer
In content section. Select this link to jump to navigation

The concept and commodity of official statistics

Abstract

New threats and opportunities make it imperative to rethink the foundations of official statistics. This essay examines the industry's freedom of action. It identifies four ways of defining official statistics and considers their impact. It treats official statistics as a commodity, and the prospects of trading the commodity are examined relative to the concepts of public and private goods, merit goods and the common good, goods versus services, search, experience and credence goods, semi-finished and finished products. Product quality is discussed relative to the quality criteria of conformance to specifications and fitness for purposes, and the means to achieve quality are discussed as standardisation and customisation. The means determine the comparability of the statistics, and comparability determines the opportunities for perfect and monopolistic competition. The essay notes that the official statistics industry empowers those who compare, but also that it makes an exception for itself. Finally it is suggested that the biggest threat to the statistical agencies may not be the coming of competition but inability to rejuvenate the product set due to confinement in the state's bureaucracy.

References

[1] 

HLG-MOS, Strategic Vision of the HLG. Last modified (2014) . High-Level Group for the Modernisation of Official Statistics. Available at UNECE Statistics Wikis.

[2] 

EU, Regulation (EU) No 99/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 January (2013) on the European statistical programme 2013-17. Official Journal of the European Union, 9 February.

[3] 

ESS, ESS Vision 2020. Building the future of European statistics. The European Statistical System, Luxembourg, (2015) .

[4] 

Statistikutredningen, Vad är officiell statistik? En översyn av statistiksystemet och SCB. SOU 2012:83. Finansdepartementet, Stockholm, (2012) .

[5] 

Statistical Modernisation Community, Statement of Intent. Last modified (2016) . Available at UNECE Statistics Wiki.

[6] 

National Statistician's guidance: identifying official statistics. Government Statistical Service December 2012, superseding that published February (2010) .

[7] 

Regulation (EC) No 223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March (2009) on European statistics, Official Journal of the European Union, 31 March.

[8] 

Holcombe RG, A Theory of the Theory of Public Goods, The Review of Austrian Economics 10: (1) ((1997) ), 1-22.

[9] 

Samuelson PA, The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure, Review of Economics and Statistics 36: (4)((1954) ), 387-9.

[10] 

Buchanan JM, An Economic Theory of Clubs, Economica, New Series 32: (125) ((1965) ), 1-14.

[11] 

Ostrom EC, Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, (1990) .

[12] 

SSB, Strategy 2014-2017, Statistics Norway, Oslo, (2014) .

[13] 

ONS, ONS Strategy 2013-2023, Office for National Statistics, Newport, (2013) .

[14] 

Eurostat, Legal framework for European statistics. The Statistical Law, Office for Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, (2010) .

[15] 

Destatis, Strategy and Programme Plan 2015-2019, Statistisches Bundesamt, Wiesbaden, (2015) .

[16] 

Eurostat, Quality in the European statistical system - The way forward, Office for Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, (2002) .

[17] 

UN, Fundamental Principles of Official Statistics, United Nations General Assembly, New York, (2014) .

[18] 

Popper KR, The Open Society and its Enemies, Routledge, London, (1945) .

[19] 

Rolland A, Chains, Shops and Networks: Official Statistics and the Creation of Public Value, Statistika: Statistics and Economy Journal 95: (2) ((2015) ), 4-16.

[20] 

Rolland A, The Independence of the Official Statistics Producer, Radical Statistics 112: ((2015) ), 42-55.

[21] 

Fukuyama F, Political Order and Political Decay. Profile Books; London, (2014) .

[22] 

Berlin I, Two concepts of liberty. In Berlin, I, Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford University Press, Oxford, [1958] (1969) , 118-72.

[23] 

ESS, European Statistics Code of Practice. [Online] (2011) . Available at: <http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/quality/ european-statistics-code-of-practice>. [Accessed 5 February 2012].

[24] 

Musgrave RA, The Theory of Public Finance. A Study in Public Economy. McGraw-Hill, New York, (1959) .

[25] 

Hughes EC, Men and their Work. Free Press, Glencoe, (1958) .

[26] 

Walsh K, Quality and Public Services. Public Administration 69: (4) ((1991) ), 503-14.

[27] 

Schumpeter JA, Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, Routledge, London and New York, [1942] (2010) .

[28] 

Deming WE, On the Distinction between Enumerative and Analytic Surveys. Journal of the American Statistical Association 48: ((1953) ), 244-55.

[29] 

Deming WE, On Probability as a Basis for Action. The American Statistician 29: (4) ((1975) ), 146-52.

[30] 

Winsor RD, , Sheth JN, , Manolis C, Differentiating goods and services retailing using form and possession utilities. Journal of Business Research 57: (3) ((2004) ), 249-55.

[31] 

Nelson P, Information and consumer behavior, Journal of Political Economy 78: (2) ((1973) ), 311-29.

[32] 

Darbi MR, , Kami E, Free Competition and the Optimal Amount of Fraud. Journal of Law and Economics 16: (1) ((1973) ), 67-88.

[33] 

Arrow KJ, Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention. In: The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity. The National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA, (1962) , 609-26.

[34] 

Kahneman D, Thinking, Fast and Slow. Penguin, London, (2012) .

[35] 

Anderson EW, , Fornell C, , Rust RT, Customer Satisfaction, Productivity, and Profitability: Differences Between Goods and Services, Marketing Science 16: (2) ((1997) ), 129-45.

[36] 

HLG-MOS, Strategy to implement the vision of the HLG. Last modified (2014) . High-Level Group for the Modernisation of Official Statistics. Available at UNECE Statistics Wikis.

[37] 

Rolland A, Towards a market strategy for the official statistics industry, Statistical Journal of the IAOS 32: ((2016) ); 597-605. DOI: 10.3233/SJI-160986.

[38] 

Harvey TR, , Broyles EA, Resistance to change: a guide to harnessing its positive power. Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, (2010) .