You are viewing a javascript disabled version of the site. Please enable Javascript for this site to function properly.
Go to headerGo to navigationGo to searchGo to contentsGo to footer
In content section. Select this link to jump to navigation

Comparing random coefficient autoregressive model with and without autocorrelated errors by Bayesian analysis

Abstract

We proposed a Bayesian analysis for estimating an unknown parameter in a Random Coefficient Autoregressive (RCA) model and its AutoRegressive (AR) process errors. We called this model an RCA model with autocorrelated errors (RCA-AR). A Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method was used to generate samples from a posterior distribution which, after having been averaged, gave the estimated value of the unknown parameter. We used a Gibbs sampling algorithm in our MCMC calculation. To compare the performances of the RCA and the RCA-AR models, a simulation was performed with a set of test data and then the mean square errors obtained were used to indicate their performance. The result was that the RCA-AR model worked better than the RCA model in every case. Lastly, we tried both models with real data. They were used to estimate a series of monthly averages of the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET) index. The result was that the RCA-AR still worked better than the RCA model, similar to the simulation of test data.

References

[1] 

Engle R.F., Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United. %

[2] 

Kingdom inflation, Econometrica % 50: ((1982) ), 987-1007.

[3] 

Bollerslev T., Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity, Journal of Econometrics 31: ((1986) ), 307-327.

[4] 

Tsay R., Conditional heteroscedastic time series models, Journal of the American Statistical Association 82: ((1987) ), 590-604.

[5] 

Nicholls D.F., and Quinn B.G., Random coefficient autoregressive models: An introduction Springer-Verlag Inc, New York, (1982) .

[6] 

Hwang S.Y., and Basawa I.V., Parameter estimation for generalized random coefficient autoregressive process, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 68: ((1998) ), 323-337.

[7] 

Chandra S.A., and Taniguchi M., Estimating Functions for Nonlinear Time Series Data, Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics 53: ((2001) ), 125-136.

[8] 

Wang D., and Ghosh S.K., Bayesian analysis of random coefficient autoregressive models, Model Assisted Statistics and Applications 3: ((2002) ), 281-295.

[9] 

Haggan V., and Ozaki T., Modeling nonlinear vibrations using an amplitude-dependent autoregressive time series model, Biometrika 68: ((1981) ), 189-196.

[10] 

Tong H., Threshold models in nonlinear time series analysis, Springer-Verlag Inc, Heidelberg, (1982) .

[11] 

Bossaerts T., , Hardle W., and Hafner C., Foreign exchange-rates have surprising volatility, Athens Conference on Applied Probability and Time Series 2: ((1996) ), 55-72.

[12] 

Gelfand A., and Smith A.F.M., Sampling-based approaches to calculating marginal densities, Journal of American Statistical Association 85: ((1990) ), 398-409.

[13] 

Geman S., and Geman D., Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions and the Bayesian restoration of images, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 6: ((1984) ), 721-741.

[14] 

Lunn D.J., , Thomas A., , Best N., and Spiegelhalter D., WinBUGS-a Bayesian modeling frameork: Concepts, structure, and extensibility, Statistics and Computing 10: ((2000) ), 325-337.