Affiliations: [a]
Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Elkins Park, PA, USA
| [b] Department of Physical Therapy, Arcadia University, Elkins Park, PA, USA
| [c] Department of Neurology, Baltimore VAMC, University of Maryland, Glenside, PA, USA
Correspondence:
[*]
Corresponding author: Shailesh Kantak, PT, PhD, Institute Scientist, Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Assistant Professor, Department of Physical Therapy, Arcadia University, Medical Arts Building, 50 Township Line Road, Elkins Park, PA, USA. E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: Inability to use the arm in daily actions significantly lowers quality of life after stroke. Most contemporary post-stroke arm rehabilitation strategies that aspire to re-engage the weaker arm in functional activities have been greatly limited in their effectiveness. Most actions of daily life engage the two arms in a highly coordinated manner. In contrast, most rehabilitation approaches predominantly focus on restitution of the impairments and unilateral practice of the weaker hand alone. We present a perspective that this misalignment between real world requirements and intervention strategies may limit the transfer of unimanual capability to spontaneous arm use and functional recovery. We propose that if improving spontaneous engagement and use of the weaker arm in real life is the goal, arm rehabilitation research and treatment need to address the coordinated interaction between arms in targeted theory-guided interventions. Current narrow focus on unimanual deficits alone, difficulty in quantifying bimanual coordination in real-world actions and limited theory-guided focus on control and remediation of different coordination modes are some of the biggest obstacles to successful implementation of effective interventions to improve bimanual coordination in the real world. We present a theory-guided taxonomy of bimanual actions that will facilitate quantification of coordination for different real-world tasks and provide treatment targets for addressing coordination deficits. We then present evidence in the literature that points to bimanual coordination deficits in stroke survivors and demonstrate how current rehabilitation approaches are limited in their impact on bimanual coordination. Importantly, we suggest theory-based areas of future investigation that may assist quantification, identification of neural mechanisms and scientifically-based training/remediation approaches for bimanual coordination deficits post-stroke. Advancing the science and practice of arm rehabilitation to incorporate bimanual coordination will lead to a more complete functional recovery of the weaker arm, thus improving the effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions and augmenting quality of life after stroke.
Keywords: Bimanual coordination, training, arm rehabilitation, stroke
