Affiliations: Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Ave.,
Pittsburgh PA, 15213, USA. E-mail: [email protected],
{rohitk,va0e,alr}@andrew.cmu.edu | US Naval Academy, 121 Blake Rd., Annapolis MD,
21402-5000, USA [email protected]
Abstract: In this article, we discuss the motivation for a novel style of
tutorial dialogue system that emphasizes reflection in a simulation based
exploratory learning environment called CyclePad, which was developed in order
to offer students practice at design and optimization of thermodynamic cycles.
We argue that while typical forms of exploration support offered in simulation
based learning environments are meant to encourage the development of good
exploration process skills, the instantiation of these typical forms of support
in CyclePad are not sufficient, primarily because students don't choose to use
them. We present a preliminary cognitive task analysis of design exploration
tasks using CyclePad. Using this cognitive task analysis, we analyze data
collected in two waves of formal data collection. Finally, we conclude with
some system desiderata derived from our analysis as well as discussion of
directions for continued experimental investigations related to tutor
style.