Affiliations: Institute of Diagnostic, Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, Klinikum Passau, Germany | Institute of Radiology, Sonography and Nuclear Medicine, Pirmasens, Germany | Departement of Clinical Radiology, University Munich, Campus Grosshardern, Germany | Ultrasound Departement, Internal Medicine II, Hospital Siloah Hannover, Germany | Institute of Plastic and Reconstruction Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Germany | Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital Regensburg, Germany
Note: [] Corresponding author: Dr. med Ernst Michael Jung, Institut für diagnostische, interventionelle Radiologie und Neu-roradiologie, Klinikum Passau, Innstr. 76, D-94032 Passau, Germany. Tel.: +49 851 5300 2366; Fax: +49 851 5300 2202; E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: Objective: To investigate the extent to which B-flow and B-flow with 3D postprocessing and speckle reduction imaging (SRI) have advantages in appraising the morphology of a high-grade stenosis of the internal carotid artery (ICA) for preinterventional planning and for postinterventional ultrasonographic follow-up. Materials/methods: A comparative appraisal of flow with CCDS, power Doppler, B-flow and 3D B-Flow with SRI were carried out prospectively in 50 patients with >70% stenosis according to NASCET criteria in contrast medium-enhanced MRA before and after the intervention. After stenting of the internal carotid artery (ICA), i.a. digital substraction angiography (DSA) served as an additional reference method. Results: In >70% ICA stenosis, simultaneous imaging of the pre-stenotic, intra-stenotic and post-stenotic flow was attained with B-flow in 45/90 cases (90%), with power Doppler in 39/50 cases (78%) and with CCDS in only 31/50 cases (62%). After intervention, a complete detection of flow without overwriting or blooming artifacts was achieved in all 50 patients only by B-flow. The intrastenotic flow (p<0.05) could be better demarcated against the lumen and the vessel wall before the intervention, whereas the flow within the stent could be very much better appraised after the intervention (p<0.01) using 3D postprocessing of B-flow with additional SRI. Re-stenoses with hypoechoic vascular wall changes (3/50 patients) were detected at an early stage using B-flow. Conclusions: B-flow technique with SRI and 3D postprocessing can facilitate the intrastenotic detection of flow in >70% ICA stenosis with fewer flow artifacts. After stenting, the perfused vascular lumen shows less flow artifacts compared with CCDS and power Doppler. In order to elucidate hemodynamic changes, additional Doppler examinations are still necessary.
